User talk:Cally99117/Archive

Archive Cally99117's talk page Archive list. Main April 28, 2009-April 22, 2024 Leave a new Message Multiple Edits Please note that making multiple edits in an article is an offense in Halopedia.- 5əb'7aŋk(7alk) 16:52, January 9, 2010 (UTC) Jun is older than seven, therefore he must have been seven at one point. The fact that in the context of the candidates ages five, six, AND seven are not distinguished as being any more important makes it a seven reference as much as it is a five and six reference. It's NOT. ApolloisNaughty 18:38, February 10, 2010 (UTC) Origins Those are not characters from Halo Wars. They may look like them but Cortana narrates the episode chronologically, thus those people we saw are just random Captains from the early years (2300s-2400s).外国人(7alk) 17:39, February 14, 2010 (UTC) No they are those characters. SPARTAN-125 Cally99117 Emphasis on "Chronologically". These Captains were mentioned by Cortana before she mentioned the Human-Covenant War, meaning she was trying to inform of the early colonisation period.外国人(7alk) 17:43, February 14, 2010 (UTC) Exactly. Besides, they don't even look like them. This was hundreds of years before their time. It's not them. - Halo-343 (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits) 17:49, February 14, 2010 (UTC) Just to add on to Halo-343's comment; all we see are silhouettes and they are not sufficient to establish that they are they same characters as in Halo Wars.外国人(7alk) 17:55, February 14, 2010 (UTC) What about when that covenant ship in Halo Wars:Genesis. it took ages to classify the ship it was. SPARTAN-125 Cally99117 What has that got to do with anything? - Halo-343 (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits) 18:02, February 14, 2010 (UTC) While I might not have the best knowledge on the situation of this, I'd like to ask all of you to cease edit warring and sort your disputes here, come to an agreement and then finalize your edits. If it doesn't stop, the articles will be locked. This is the only warning I'm giving. - File:Major.png|20px]] Nìcmávr (Tálk) 18:03, February 14, 2010 (UTC) No one comes to an agreement with me!. 7h3 Ma573r Chi3f (5par7an-117) (J0hn) (Ma573r Chi3f P377y 0ffic3r) 14:51, April 1, 2010 (UTC) As a semi-vet user, I think you should follow up Nicmavr. Do not make pointless edit wars because that's when the admins lock articles and ban people. If you don't want to be banned, although I am not an admin I strongly suggest you just talk this over with whoever you're edit warring with and not continuing to revert their edits. S-984 18:27, February 14, 2010 (UTC) Red Team Before you ask, I reverted your edit because there were four Spartans seen, Red Team only has three. It might be them, but we have no confirmation, or evidence to suggest so. - Halo-343 (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits) 13:25, March 28, 2010 (UTC) That doesn't change anything but I am not going into an edit war with you. SPARTAN-125 Cally99117 Mendicant Bias I consolidated the Origins subsection since I wasn't sure which one to reply to. But as to my reason for being here, Frankie confirmed here that 05-032 Mendicant Bias was in Origins. Please stop deleting that sourced fact. Thank you. -- Lord Hyren 16:32, March 29, 2010 (UTC) But he was defected to the flood after the the halos were built but the monitor that was seen in was before the halos were built I don't know why he confirmed it when it wasn't the truth. SPARTAN-125 Cally99117 Yet Frankie confirmed it, so what other choice do we have? He has had the Halo Bible in his possession at some time (I assume), so its our best bet to listen to him. --  General5 7    talk    contribs    email   15:00, April 1, 2010 (UTC) Origins AGAIN I reverted it because this has been reverted several times before, because the term "Halo Array" covers all the Halos already, and having each individual one on the page just takes up space and messes things up. - Halo-343 (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits) 15:01, April 1, 2010 (UTC) Well if it does then revert all the other useless edits that are not just mine! And when has it been reverted several times before? When I added it you only moved them into different parts of the Characters Section. - SPARTAN-125 Cally99117 I'm not picking on you, your edits just happen to fall under the criteria that require them to be reverted or deleted. - Halo-343 (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits) 15:08, April 1, 2010 (UTC) When I was new to Halopedia you use to revert all my edits, and what criteria is that. SPARTAN-125 Cally99117 Edit Warring I have blocked you again and again for constant reversion of edits without any type of dialog. If I block you again for the same offense, it will be for a very long time. This is my one and only warning to you. Stop the petty edit warring. SmokeSound off! 16:55, April 10, 2010 (UTC) I don't get information on why my edits should be reverted. SPARTAN-125 Cally99117 Yes you do. - Halo-343 (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits) 17:02, April 10, 2010 (UTC) When someone reverts your edit, read their edit summary, that should tell you right there. El Ammo Bandito, "¡Para todas sus necesidades destructivas!" 17:04, April 10, 2010 (UTC) If for some reason you don't get information, you better start asking. SmokeSound off! 17:12, April 10, 2010 (UTC) Question Is there any reason why you are reverting edits changing "Battle" to "Fall"?-- Forerunner 16:27, April 11, 2010 (UTC) Go here for the information. ----> Master Chief Petty Officer John-117 (Personal Favorite). 16:29, April 11, 2010 (UTC) Please stop reverting. This is turning into an edit-war.- 5əb'7aŋk(7alk) 16:32, April 11, 2010 (UTC) It's not like they link to two different pages.-- Forerunner 16:34, April 11, 2010 (UTC) How am I edit warring? No one is reverting my edits but I will stop if you want. SPARTAN-125 Cally99117 Or how about... You STFU and leave my talk page alone? Ajax 013 18:17, May 4, 2010 (UTC) STFU back. SPARTAN-125 Cally99117 Don't mess with people's pages for good reasons, k? And there are something called manners...--  General5 7    talk    contribs    email   21:18, May 25, 2010 (UTC) Why was Jugus removing red links on user pages while you don't want me to do it? And why are you so negative with me? --> My Page Talk Page Contributions Page All Edits Page Email Page (Favourite Page) (Opinion Page) 06:50, May 26, 2010 (UTC) Was Jugus telling some user to do something? No. He was merely removing red links, unlike you, who chose to order Ajax to do something. And to your last question, I am being negative because you act like everything you do is correct, with complete disregard to others. My advice to you (as I've said many times before), is get your damn attitude together. --  General5 7    talk    contribs    email   18:03, June 15, 2010 (UTC) I wasn't ordering but I was just trying to help a bit, I did not care if he/she rejected it but the comment made here was a bit rude. --SPARTAN-125 Cally99117 And yet you made a rude comment back? Phail. Quit playing innocent. --  General5 7    talk    contribs    email   18:16, June 15, 2010 (UTC) And you joined the side of a user that reacted to a single comment wrongly. Phail --SPARTAN-125 Cally99117 Since you are choosing yourself to react badly to my own comment (with the last part of my first message directed to both of you), I'm just going to close this argument. But keep that attitude up, and you may earn yourself a ban. This will be your first warning. --  General5 7    talk    contribs    email   18:21, June 15, 2010 (UTC) Cally, both you and Ajax are in the wrong. How about we just drop the argument before something bad happens. - Nìcmávr (Tálk) 18:24, June 15, 2010 (UTC) sorry Yeh I forgot that the plasma was fired when it needed to be shut down sorry about that -zephspacer- RE: Species templates First of all, I had no idea about that template's name. Personally, I see no reason for their name to be changed. First of all, the names of the templates themselves do not appear in the articles, so they have no need to be formalized. Additionally, look at this. We would want to make it titled "Halo 3 Medals" and make it more difficult when we don't? --  General5 7    talk    contribs    email   15:53, June 14, 2010 (UTC) Again see this. --SPARTAN-125 Cally99117 If you're just going to put a link and tell me to look at it, then I will not switch sides. Do you not have an argument?   General5 7    talk    contribs    email   If you disagree with me about this then why don't you revert that edit because it is the same thing that I was doing. --SPARTAN-125 Cally99117 I was preventing a potential edit war. I will, if you have no argument supporting edits.   General5 7    talk    contribs    email   I actually became Neutral when you reverted my edit but I was here to tell you that there was another edit exactly the same as mine (even though it was on a different template) that was not reverted. --SPARTAN-125 Cally99117 “ Just look at this and say that again. ” You sure didn't make that obvious. You might want to treat people with a little less attitude than you do now.   General5 7    talk    contribs    email