Talk:Sniper rifle (disambiguation)

Votes for Deletion

Delete (4)

• Delete Not much need. and Apparently C-V says he made the Disambiguation and then Caboose took over and redirected it to her own newer one. Template:UserForerunner

• Delete And as for SPARTAN-077 what the bloody hell does it mater who made it? -- Xeon Zero File:Halo at 1.jpg ^{SPEAK ….. I’m a watcher not an editor}

• DELETE It would make more scenes to keep the old redirect instead of redirecting to a redirect.--Running Riot Ryan 13:02, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

• DELETE Ill fix the old one, if thats what ya think --Climax-Void File:Hammer sickle.png ^{Chat or My Contributions}

---

Look at this and see

Keep (4)

• STRONG KEEP Instead, I have had that redirected to this. Respect them Grunts, Mouse File:XtremeBoxer1.jpg 21:53, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

• KEEP its odd that someone would put something Caboose had made up for deletion --SPARTAN-077^(Talk)File:Char riza.jpg 00:01, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

• STRONG KEEP without it, Sniper Rifle would be a disambiguation page, but disambiguation pages are supposed to have (disambigation) on the end, like this one does. g^üé_ߣ^¥-π_éҐ^∫ø_ñ¥-^†ħ_îИ^g¥ 06:43, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

• Strong Keep - I don't understand this AfD article at all. Sniper Rifle and Sniper rifle redirect to Sniper Rifle (disambiguation). SRDisambig lead to the S2 AM sniper rifles and the beam rifle...or am I missing something?...Cheers, RelentlessRecusant 'o the Halopedia Team ^TALK • _SPEAK 16:08, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

I just edited this page to fix the more blatant grammar mistakes and redundancies.

Creation of SRS99 Series article

Should we create an article about the SRS99 Series, using the same layout from the MA5 Series? It's pretty much a given that all sniper rifles in the games belong in the SRS99 Series, with further evidence provided by the EVG (page 179, I think).— subtank 07:22, 31 August 2012 (EDT)

I'm definitely in favor of creating such an article. To mirror the MA5 and M6 articles, I suggest that the article be divided by series. They could be listed like so, with proper section formatting:

1 Overview
  1.1 Technical specifications
  1.2. Ammunition
2 Sniper Rifle System 99 Anti-Matériel
3 Sniper Rifle System 99-Series 2 Anti-Matériel
  3.1 Sniper Rifle System 99C-S2 Anti-Matériel
    3.1.1 ''AMB'' variant
  3.2 Sniper Rifle System 99D-S2 Anti-Matériel
4. Sniper Rifle System 99-Series 5 Anti-Matériel

I think this would be an effective layout. --Courage never dies. 08:30, 31 August 2012 (EDT)

Would be better using just "Series 2" and "Series 5" (why the big jump from 2 to 5 is up for speculationists)... but agreed. Anyone else disagreeing with this? :) — subtank 08:40, 31 August 2012 (EDT)