Talk:Sinaris-pattern heavy destroyer

File:covenantvessel.jpg|thumb|200px|Wow, thats fan made? Nice picture! Looks alot like something done by somone who made Halo than a fan.--prophit of war 14:54, 17 December 2006 (UTC)]]

Untitled

Some people have classified this as a CPV-class destroyer. Is this a mistake?--Spartan 118 03:10, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Yes. First because this is a fan-made image, this vessel has never appeared or been described in the Halo universe, and second because the people who created it falsely assume that "destroyer" is the term for the largest ships of the Covenant. a Wikipedia:Destroyer is actually only slightly larger than a frigate, and the CCS-class of ship would be significantly larger than any "destroyer." Even an Assault Carrier would be smaller than this. If a vessel of this size were ever put into the Halo universe, it would probably be classified as a battleship. But again, this image is not a part of the Halo universe. -ED 03:41, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

That vessel in the picture is proposed to be a Covenant Dreadnaught. Once i find the link, i will post it --Will 20:00, 05 January 2007 (UTC)

it's fan made. and there is no "Covenant Dreadnaught". Cheers, 49 Proximal Secant^[oracle]File:H3 Monitor.PNG|25px]] 01:02, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

back on topic. do destroyers have energy projectors?--Will 20:16, 05 January 2007 (UTC)

No, Keyes described it as a "new weapon" on the Battle of Reach. And he had seen destroyer doing what they did best previously. Mutoid Chief 18:01, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Rename CPV-class Destroyer

The Halo Encyclopedia describes the Reverence and Esteem as a "CPV-class Destroyer" on page 274 and 275 respectively.--Rusty-UserWiki:Rusty-112|112]] 05:44, November 24, 2009 (UTC)

Support

1. Support - as per above --Rusty-UserWiki:Rusty-112|112]] 05:44, November 24, 2009 (UTC)
2. Support - No doubt, it's a destroyer.--Sgt.T.N.Biscuits 05:52, November 24, 2009 (UTC)
3. Support -- General5 7 ^Gobble? 16:42, November 25, 2009 (UTC)

Renaming to CPV-class Destroyer

Took a look at the history logs and it seems that the template was recently moved back to its old title. Any reason why? - 5əb'7aŋk^(7alk) 17:31, 25 November 2010 (EST)

I have no idea. Must've happened as part of the content moving process. Evolutions refers to it as "CPV-class heavy destroyer" though, so I don't know if that would be a more accurate title. --Jugus (Talk | Contribs) 17:42, 25 November 2010 (EST)