Talk:Order of battle (Viery, Reach): Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
(Created page with "== Merging 'em articles? == There is a lot of unnecessary links in this article. As it currently stands, most of the regiments, companies and battalions [[Halopedia:Notability...") |
m (Text replacement - "([A-Za-z]+) Policy" to "$1 policy") |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Merging 'em articles? == | == Merging 'em articles? == | ||
There is a lot of unnecessary links in this article. As it currently stands, most of the regiments, companies and battalions [[Halopedia:Notability | There is a lot of unnecessary links in this article. As it currently stands, most of the regiments, companies and battalions [[Halopedia:Notability policy|do not seem notable enough to have their own articles]]. Taking a few examples, articles like [[4th Regiment]], [[3rd Battalion]] and [[22nd Shock Troops Battalion]] are simply trivial mentions. It would be better to redirect all of these links to this article.— <span style="font-size:16px; font-family:OrbitronMedium;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 09:12, 31 August 2012 (EDT) | ||
:Just bumping my old proposal. Since there's no comments after almost a year, I assume we have no issue with this? — <span style="font-size:14px; font-family:Arial;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 01:36, 30 April 2013 (EDT) | |||
::I agree that the articles should be merged. Most of them are just variations of the same few sentences. --[[User:Braidenvl|Courage never dies.]] ([[User talk:Braidenvl|talk]]) 07:38, 30 April 2013 (EDT) | |||
:::And done. — <span style="font-size:14px; font-family:Arial;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 12:17, 8 July 2013 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:09, July 29, 2021
Merging 'em articles?[edit]
There is a lot of unnecessary links in this article. As it currently stands, most of the regiments, companies and battalions do not seem notable enough to have their own articles. Taking a few examples, articles like 4th Regiment, 3rd Battalion and 22nd Shock Troops Battalion are simply trivial mentions. It would be better to redirect all of these links to this article.— subtank 09:12, 31 August 2012 (EDT)
- Just bumping my old proposal. Since there's no comments after almost a year, I assume we have no issue with this? — subtank 01:36, 30 April 2013 (EDT)
- I agree that the articles should be merged. Most of them are just variations of the same few sentences. --Courage never dies. (talk) 07:38, 30 April 2013 (EDT)
- And done. — subtank 12:17, 8 July 2013 (EDT)