Halopedia talk:Layout guide: Difference between revisions

Line 72:

I don't really see the problem with listing appearances in order of release date. Does the media type really even matter that much here? Appearance lists are chiefly about listing the subject's appearances rather than cataloging different types of media. As for having different sections for different media types, it looks nice but I can't help but feel it's a needlessly complicated way to present something that's ultimately very simple. Chronological order works the best for me.--[[User:Jugus|Jugus]] ([[User talk:Jugus|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jugus|Contribs]]) 08:49, 13 May 2012 (EDT)

:Guess you're right. :) — [[User:Subtank|subtank]] 11:13, 13 May 2012 (EDT)

Revision as of 08:49, May 13, 2012 (edit) Tacitus (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 11:13, May 13, 2012 (edit) (undo) Subtank (talk \| contribs) m (Tucker, I got their attention. Now, pester them for an update on layout and format!) Newer edit →
Line 72:		Line 72:

	I don't really see the problem with listing appearances in order of release date. Does the media type really even matter that much here? Appearance lists are chiefly about listing the subject's appearances rather than cataloging different types of media. As for having different sections for different media types, it looks nice but I can't help but feel it's a needlessly complicated way to present something that's ultimately very simple. Chronological order works the best for me.--[[User:Jugus\|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus\|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jugus\|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]])</small> 08:49, 13 May 2012 (EDT)		I don't really see the problem with listing appearances in order of release date. Does the media type really even matter that much here? Appearance lists are chiefly about listing the subject's appearances rather than cataloging different types of media. As for having different sections for different media types, it looks nice but I can't help but feel it's a needlessly complicated way to present something that's ultimately very simple. Chronological order works the best for me.--[[User:Jugus\|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus\|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jugus\|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]])</small> 08:49, 13 May 2012 (EDT)

			:Guess you're right. :) — <span style="font-size:16px; font-family:OrbitronMedium;">[[User:Subtank\|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 11:13, 13 May 2012 (EDT)