Talk:Iris: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
(→"Detailed Article": new section) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Those links don't work anymore. If I wasn't nice enough to discuss it first, I'd remove the whole section. Thoughts? [[User:The 888th Avatar|<span style="color:blue;">The 888th Avatar</span>]] [[User_talk:The 888th Avatar|<sup><span style="color:blue;">(Talk)</span></sup>]] 11:56, 8 March 2009 (UTC) | Those links don't work anymore. If I wasn't nice enough to discuss it first, I'd remove the whole section. Thoughts? [[User:The 888th Avatar|<span style="color:blue;">The 888th Avatar</span>]] [[User_talk:The 888th Avatar|<sup><span style="color:blue;">(Talk)</span></sup>]] 11:56, 8 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
:We have an alternate site for Iris. [http://halo.wikibruce.com/Home Click Me!].-<b>[[User:Subtank|<font color="gold"><font color="#FF4F00">5</font>ub<font color="#FF4F00">7</font>ank</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Subtank|<font color="#FF4F00">7alk</font>]])</sup></b> 13:06, 8 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:06, March 8, 2009
Non-Canon
Since Iris was viral marketing scheme, maybe it should not be considered canon. As it was just to used to promote the Halo series. -Corporal John
- I don't know, some things have come up in Halo 3. Like ILB, I would consider Iris canon until contradicted elsewhere. --Dragonclaws(talk) 23:40, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- It also contradicts the book Contact Harvest, which confirmed as canon. - Corporal John
"Detailed Article"
Those links don't work anymore. If I wasn't nice enough to discuss it first, I'd remove the whole section. Thoughts? The 888th Avatar (Talk) 11:56, 8 March 2009 (UTC)