Halopedia:Notability policy: Difference between revisions

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
{{Policy}}
{{Policy}}
{{Policies}}
{{Policies}}
This policy details Halopedia's policies on notability, which is loosely based off Wikipedia's notability policy.
This policy details Halopedia's stand on notability, which is loosely based off Wikipedia's notability policy. The focus of this policy is to provide a clear guideline for any form of content


== Overview ==
== Overview ==
Notability determines whether a topic merits its own article. Article topics are required to be notable, or "worthy of notice." It is important to note that a notability determination does not necessarily depend on things like fame, importance, or the popularity of a topic—although those may enhance the acceptability of a subject that meets the guidelines explained below:
The dictionary definition for notable means "worthy of attention or notice". It is not synonymous with "fame" or "importance," and even content that editors personally believe are "important" or "famous" are only accepted as notable if they can be shown to have attracted notice (see [[#Requirements|Requirements]]). Like Wikipedia, Halopedia bases its decision about whether content is notable enough to justify a separate article on the verifiable evidence that the content has attracted.


== Criteria ==
Content recognized by the official parties of the Halo franchise are exempted from this criteria.<ref group="note">In this policy, '''official parties of the Halo franchise''' shall be limited to the staff of 343 Industries, Bungie, and Ensemble Studios, and its licensees.</ref> Simple recognition is insufficient recognition: in other to be considered "recognized", the content must be included in an official Halo product.
Keeping in mind that all articles must conform with the policy on verifiability to reliable sources, and mere description of the information by official sources are not sufficient toy establish notability; they may be notable based on meeting one of the following criteria:


*The information has all the necessary quality that can be included in articles and that it has significant coverage to such extent that it is more than a trivial mention.<ref group="note">A perfect example of this would be [[List of food and drinks]].</ref> Furthermore, the information has reliable and reputable sources that are independent of the subject.<ref group="note">Here, reliable and reputable sources would typically refer to established parties that contribute to the development of the Halo franchise and its community. Such examples would be like [[halo.bungie.org]], [[Ascendant Justice (blog)]] and [[Rooster Teeth Productions]]. The best example of a non-reputable/reliable source is Youtube, specifically Youtube commentators.</ref>
== Requirements ==
*The information has all the necessary quality of having its own article. There is a foreseeable certainty that the information will see sufficient and future growth. If otherwise, the information must be capable of presenting itself concisely in a section of an article than in its own article. If the information is essentially a copy of a Wikipedia entry, a simple interwiki link to that Wikipedia will suffice and that information should be kept in a form of a summary.<ref group="note">This is also to ensure that the wiki complies with Wikipedia's own attribution policy.</ref>
Keeping in mind that all articles must conform with the policy on verifiability to reliable sources, and mere description of the information by official sources are not sufficient toy establish notability; they may be notable based on meeting one of the following requirements:
 
=== General content ===
A content shall be deemed worthy of having its own article when it can be shown that it has all the necessary qualities of an article. It must be shown that:
*it has significant coverage to the extent that it is more than a trivial mention; or
*there is a foreseeable certainty that the information will see sufficient and future growth; and
*the information has reliable and reputable sources that are independent of the subject.<ref group="note">"Reliable and reputable sources" would adopt a similar description of Wikipedia's own [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Independent_sources|independent sources]]. Examples of independent third-parties are [[halo.bungie.org]], [[Ascendant Justice (blog)]] and [[rampancy.net]].</ref>
 
If the content is not notable, it can be included in Halopedia by adding it into relevant articles if it has the appropriate level of detail and significance for that article such as [[Pre-Xbox Halo]], or if it can be described in a relevant list such as [[List of food and drinks]]. If the information is essentially a copy of a wiki entry (such as Wikipedia), a simple link to that wiki will suffice and that information should be kept in a form of a summary.<ref group="note">This is also to ensure that Halopedia complies with wiki's own attribution policy.</ref>
 
=== Fan content ===
The requirement under this section is loosely based off Wookieepedia's [[w:c:Wookieepedia:Notability of fan projects|notability policy for fan content]]. Articles on fan content, such as websites, games or webcomics, are allowed on Halopedia as long as they are '''sufficiently notable'''. In order to show notability, an article on a fan content must pass at least one of the "recognition" requirements as well as the "content" requirement:
 
;Recognition
*'''Official recognition''': A fan content which has received official recognition by official parties of the Halo franchise may be a suitable subject for an article.
*'''Independent, third party recognition''': A fan content which has reliable and reputable sources may have sufficient recognition, even if official recognition is absent or limited to brief mentions.
*'''Fan recognition''': A fan content which has not been mentioned in mainstream media or recognized by official sources may still be notable if it has widespread recognition within the Halo fan community. Note that this is the hardest form of recognition to substantiate, and the standards of evidence must be correspondingly high.
 
;Content
*A fan content must be non-trivial (i.e. finalized, completed and of substantial scale within its genre).


== Notes ==
== Notes ==
<references group="note"/>
<references group="note"/>

Revision as of 11:26, September 27, 2013

Template:Shortcut

Main-Forerunner.png
This page is an official Halopedia policy
Please read through the policy below to familiarize yourself with our common practices and rules.
If you have any questions, suggestions, or complaints, please post them on the talk page.

Template:Policies This policy details Halopedia's stand on notability, which is loosely based off Wikipedia's notability policy. The focus of this policy is to provide a clear guideline for any form of content

Overview

The dictionary definition for notable means "worthy of attention or notice". It is not synonymous with "fame" or "importance," and even content that editors personally believe are "important" or "famous" are only accepted as notable if they can be shown to have attracted notice (see Requirements). Like Wikipedia, Halopedia bases its decision about whether content is notable enough to justify a separate article on the verifiable evidence that the content has attracted.

Content recognized by the official parties of the Halo franchise are exempted from this criteria.[note 1] Simple recognition is insufficient recognition: in other to be considered "recognized", the content must be included in an official Halo product.

Requirements

Keeping in mind that all articles must conform with the policy on verifiability to reliable sources, and mere description of the information by official sources are not sufficient toy establish notability; they may be notable based on meeting one of the following requirements:

General content

A content shall be deemed worthy of having its own article when it can be shown that it has all the necessary qualities of an article. It must be shown that:

  • it has significant coverage to the extent that it is more than a trivial mention; or
  • there is a foreseeable certainty that the information will see sufficient and future growth; and
  • the information has reliable and reputable sources that are independent of the subject.[note 2]

If the content is not notable, it can be included in Halopedia by adding it into relevant articles if it has the appropriate level of detail and significance for that article such as Pre-Xbox Halo, or if it can be described in a relevant list such as List of food and drinks. If the information is essentially a copy of a wiki entry (such as Wikipedia), a simple link to that wiki will suffice and that information should be kept in a form of a summary.[note 3]

Fan content

The requirement under this section is loosely based off Wookieepedia's notability policy for fan content. Articles on fan content, such as websites, games or webcomics, are allowed on Halopedia as long as they are sufficiently notable. In order to show notability, an article on a fan content must pass at least one of the "recognition" requirements as well as the "content" requirement:

Recognition
  • Official recognition: A fan content which has received official recognition by official parties of the Halo franchise may be a suitable subject for an article.
  • Independent, third party recognition: A fan content which has reliable and reputable sources may have sufficient recognition, even if official recognition is absent or limited to brief mentions.
  • Fan recognition: A fan content which has not been mentioned in mainstream media or recognized by official sources may still be notable if it has widespread recognition within the Halo fan community. Note that this is the hardest form of recognition to substantiate, and the standards of evidence must be correspondingly high.
Content
  • A fan content must be non-trivial (i.e. finalized, completed and of substantial scale within its genre).

Notes

  1. ^ In this policy, official parties of the Halo franchise shall be limited to the staff of 343 Industries, Bungie, and Ensemble Studios, and its licensees.
  2. ^ "Reliable and reputable sources" would adopt a similar description of Wikipedia's own independent sources. Examples of independent third-parties are halo.bungie.org, Ascendant Justice (blog) and rampancy.net.
  3. ^ This is also to ensure that Halopedia complies with wiki's own attribution policy.