Talk:D81-LRT Condor: Difference between revisions

Line 16:

::::::That's the problem, it looks exactly like a D79 Pelican. Right down to the bubble-canopy style cockpit. And it's definitely not big enough in scale next to the nearby personnel to be anything "Double" or "Super" in any way. So yeah, I think 343 Industries is recycling yet another design just as they recycled the CAS-class for the ''Long Night of Solace'' and the CCS-class for the CRS-class, and the Shadow for a Covenant Tug, or the Halcyon-class for the Autumn-class. This is something I consider lazy, I hate seeing designs recycled into new types of ships which are different pretty much almost solely by name and classification, rather than offering new, unique designs for brand new ship types they introduce in the series. So yeah, this is something I wish 343 would stop doing.[[User:262VigilantGuardian|262VigilantGuardian]] ([[User talk:262VigilantGuardian|talk]]) 05:38, 11 November 2014 (EST)

:::::::Honestly? You guys want change? You guys want better spot on quality? How about TOGETHER collectively discussing such issues on waypoint and bringing 343i's story attention. Collectively, maybe we can discuss issues on a forum here then make a thread there. I have my own issues, such as the weakness of canon weaponry, particularly UNSC, but doing this alone is Hardee. [[User:Erickyboo|Erickyboo]] ([[User talk:Erickyboo|talk]]) 07:30, 11 November 2014 (EST)

:::::::Okay, we got new images implying a much larger passenger bay and four rear-light engines. Okay, that might make it a little more believable that this is not exactly another Pelican. But it could simply be the Troop Transport Pod that never made it into the earlier games. Or those engines could be a custom modification by Sedra, but who knows?[[User:262VigilantGuardian|262VigilantGuardian]] ([[User talk:262VigilantGuardian|talk]]) 13:43, 11 November 2014 (EST)

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 ::::::That's the problem, it looks exactly like a D79 Pelican. Right down to the bubble-canopy style cockpit. And it's definitely not big enough in scale next to the nearby personnel to be anything "Double" or "Super" in any way. So yeah, I think 343 Industries is recycling yet another design just as they recycled the CAS-class for the ''Long Night of Solace'' and the CCS-class for the CRS-class, and the Shadow for a Covenant Tug, or the Halcyon-class for the Autumn-class. This is something I consider lazy, I hate seeing designs recycled into new types of ships which are different pretty much almost solely by name and classification, rather than offering new, unique designs for brand new ship types they introduce in the series. So yeah, this is something I wish 343 would stop doing.[[User:262VigilantGuardian|262VigilantGuardian]] ([[User talk:262VigilantGuardian|talk]]) 05:38, 11 November 2014 (EST)
 :::::::Honestly? You guys want change? You guys want better spot on quality? How about TOGETHER collectively discussing such issues on waypoint and bringing 343i's story attention. Collectively, maybe we can discuss issues on a forum here then make a thread there. I have my own issues, such as the weakness of canon weaponry, particularly UNSC, but doing this alone is Hardee. [[User:Erickyboo|Erickyboo]] ([[User talk:Erickyboo|talk]]) 07:30, 11 November 2014 (EST)
+:::::::Okay, we got new images implying a much larger passenger bay and four rear-light engines. Okay, that might make it a little more believable that this is not exactly another Pelican. But it could simply be the Troop Transport Pod that never made it into the earlier games. Or those engines could be a custom modification by Sedra, but who knows?[[User:262VigilantGuardian|262VigilantGuardian]] ([[User talk:262VigilantGuardian|talk]]) 13:43, 11 November 2014 (EST)