View source for Talk:Sulok-pattern beam rifle

==Halo 5 REQ==
Just wondering out loud, why they decided to add in the "Halo 2" Beam Rifle and not the "Halo 3" Beam Rifle. We have weapons from CE and 2 but not 3. I do prefer the H3 design more. --[[User:Crisperstorm|Crisperstorm]] ([[User talk:Crisperstorm|talk]]) 15:30, 25 June 2016 (EDT)

== Better? ==

Overall I say a good page....regardless which is better the human sniper or the covie sniper, this I'd like to know.

== Overall ==

Overall a good page

== Power Source ==

From what I've observed the Beam Rifle is powered by purple crystals, simalar to ametheist.

== Halo 4 Beam Rifle ==

Does anyone have any halo 4 pictures of the beam rifle? If so, we should add them.
Siphon 117 09:10, 24 September 2012 (EDT)

:See [[Type-27 Special Application Sniper Rifle|here]]. The beam rifle in ''Halo 4'' is a canonically separate weapon. --[[User talk:Braidenvl|Courage never dies.]] 17:39, 26 September 2012 (EDT)

::Think this message will help other users from getting confused. So, don't confuse the Type-27 Beam Rifle of ''Halo 4'' with the Type-50 Beam Rifle of ''Halo 3'', please. Spread the word around. These confusing edits has to stop, and you can help! Or whatever. :-) --[[User:Xamikaze330|Xamikaze330]] ([[User talk:Xamikaze330|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Xamikaze330|contribs]]) 23:07, 26 October 2012 (EDT)Xamikaze330
:::There are seriously '''two''' notices on that page noting the difference between the two weapons, one at the top and one hidden in the appearances section. I do not get how people keep missing them.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 23:10, 26 October 2012 (EDT)
::::To be honest, neither do I. These crazy confusing edits are starting to get on my nerves. --[[User:Xamikaze330|Xamikaze330]] ([[User talk:Xamikaze330|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Xamikaze330|contribs]]) 23:20, 26 October 2012 (EDT)Xamikaze330