Talk:Skywalker Sound: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
(→Oppose) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
===Support=== | ===Support=== | ||
{{support}} ^^What he said^^Vegerot goes RAWR! [[File:Icon-Vegito2.gif|21px]] [[User:Vegerot|<span style="color:midnightblue; font-weight:bold">Vegerot</span>]] ([[User talk:Vegerot|<span style="color:grey">talk</span>]]) 22:53, 19 September 2011 (EDT)!!! | #. {{support}} ^^What he said^^Vegerot goes RAWR! [[File:Icon-Vegito2.gif|21px]] [[User:Vegerot|<span style="color:midnightblue; font-weight:bold">Vegerot</span>]] ([[User talk:Vegerot|<span style="color:grey">talk</span>]]) 22:53, 19 September 2011 (EDT)!!! | ||
{{Support}} - As per Tuckerscreator.--[[User:Halofan1234|ハローファン]] ([[User talk:Halofan1234|H1234-NET]]) 22:56, 19 September 2011 (EDT) | <S> | ||
#. {{Support}} - As per Tuckerscreator.--[[User:Halofan1234|ハローファン]] ([[User talk:Halofan1234|H1234-NET]]) 22:56, 19 September 2011 (EDT)</S> | |||
===Neutral=== | ===Neutral=== | ||
| Line 15: | Line 16: | ||
===Oppose=== | ===Oppose=== | ||
#{{Oppose}} I don't see anything particularly wrong with this page, especially considering the significance it holds for ''Halo: Anniversary'' and possibly future works by 343i. I also don't see a reason why we're nit picking articles out of the lot now, as long as there's good content on the page that allows us to warrant it not to just link it to Wikipedia in the first place, why should we? This seems like a well put article, relatively speaking, in my opinion; and to be quite honest, its quite obvious that a bunch of you forgot that this article was just created. We don't know what content we'll see between now, November 15th, and beyond concerning them. Its simply too early to tell. {{User:CommanderTony/Sig}} | #{{Oppose}} I don't see anything particularly wrong with this page, especially considering the significance it holds for ''Halo: Anniversary'' and possibly future works by 343i. I also don't see a reason why we're nit picking articles out of the lot now, as long as there's good content on the page that allows us to warrant it not to just link it to Wikipedia in the first place, why should we? This seems like a well put article, relatively speaking, in my opinion; and to be quite honest, its quite obvious that a bunch of you forgot that this article was just created. We don't know what content we'll see between now, November 15th, and beyond concerning them. Its simply too early to tell. {{User:CommanderTony/Sig}} | ||
#. {{Oppose}} - As per CT.--[[User:Halofan1234|ハローファン]] ([[User talk:Halofan1234|H1234-NET]]) 23:49, 19 September 2011 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 23:49, September 19, 2011
Closing the floodgate
I think I see a flood of entities getting their own article in Halopedia soon. While all these companies and studios are worthy of having their own article, I think that if they have their own Wikipedia article, then let Wikipedia handle it (and a link to that article provided). However, there is an exception to this personal rule of mine; only official parties that have contribute significantly and frequently to the Halo dsevelopment should be awarded their own article. Of course, 343 Industries and Bungie would fall in this category. This is simply to avoid dead articles, such as Production I.G and Studio 4°C. A list of companies can be found here. — subtank 14:50, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
- Okay, I understand your reasoning. So will this article be deleted?--Brute Honour Guard
("Talk") 14:55, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
- Well, I think it should. Don't know if anyone else disagrees.— subtank 14:59, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
I agree, unless the article has the potential to expand, or has information that can't be covered on its Wikipedia page. Some kind of restriction would be good, there's been plenty of wikis where people go overboard with articles like these. Tuckerscreator(stalk) 19:35, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
Support
- .
Support ^^What he said^^Vegerot goes RAWR! File:Icon-Vegito2.gif Vegerot (talk) 22:53, 19 September 2011 (EDT)!!!
Neutral
Oppose
Oppose I don't see anything particularly wrong with this page, especially considering the significance it holds for Halo: Anniversary and possibly future works by 343i. I also don't see a reason why we're nit picking articles out of the lot now, as long as there's good content on the page that allows us to warrant it not to just link it to Wikipedia in the first place, why should we? This seems like a well put article, relatively speaking, in my opinion; and to be quite honest, its quite obvious that a bunch of you forgot that this article was just created. We don't know what content we'll see between now, November 15th, and beyond concerning them. Its simply too early to tell. User:CommanderTony/Sig- . Oppose - As per CT.--ハローファン (H1234-NET) 23:49, 19 September 2011 (EDT)