Talk:ANVIL Station: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
(Created page with "Um forgive me for asking, but where does it say Halo 5 has this station? --CIA391 (talk) 20:18, 25 March 2015 (GMT)") |
m (Dab1001 moved page Talk:Anvil Station to Talk:ANVIL Station) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==''Halo 5''== | |||
Um forgive me for asking, but where does it say Halo 5 has this station? --[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 20:18, 25 March 2015 (GMT) | Um forgive me for asking, but where does it say Halo 5 has this station? --[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 20:18, 25 March 2015 (GMT) | ||
:I don't think it was explicitly stated that Anvil and the ''Halo 5'' station were one and the same. Unless there is a confirmation, I would avoid saying that. We don't know how many training facilities / space stations the S-IVs have at their disposal. [[User:Imrane-117|Imrane-117]] ([[User talk:Imrane-117|talk]]) 16:41, 25 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
::I was just curious why the article was saying that. Seemed weird so I thought I would ask. --[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 21:54, 25 March 2015 (GMT) | |||
==343 Industries and Microsoft helped develop Anvil== | |||
[[File:Anvil Station Blueprint.png|thumb|300px]] | |||
Well the image that has this is the only source we have. Shouldn't we follow it by the letter till another source goes into more detail. I mean it hasnt stopped us saying 343 Industries made the Fotus armor. And Microsoft must still be a company in the future. I mean its symbol does appear in a easter egg also on a Halo Map also. So I dont see why we should take out that they helped develop this station. --[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 23:25, 28 December 2015 (GMT) | |||
:It's my understanding that the Fotus armor is barely canon. The mention of 343i and Microsoft is likely just a little joke. --[[User:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">'''NightHammer'''</span>]]''<sup>[[User talk:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(talk)</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(contribs)</span>]]</sup>'' 20:55, 28 December 2015 (EST) |
Latest revision as of 12:44, January 23, 2021
Halo 5[edit]
Um forgive me for asking, but where does it say Halo 5 has this station? --CIA391 (talk) 20:18, 25 March 2015 (GMT)
- I don't think it was explicitly stated that Anvil and the Halo 5 station were one and the same. Unless there is a confirmation, I would avoid saying that. We don't know how many training facilities / space stations the S-IVs have at their disposal. Imrane-117 (talk) 16:41, 25 March 2015 (EDT)
343 Industries and Microsoft helped develop Anvil[edit]
Well the image that has this is the only source we have. Shouldn't we follow it by the letter till another source goes into more detail. I mean it hasnt stopped us saying 343 Industries made the Fotus armor. And Microsoft must still be a company in the future. I mean its symbol does appear in a easter egg also on a Halo Map also. So I dont see why we should take out that they helped develop this station. --CIA391 (talk) 23:25, 28 December 2015 (GMT)
- It's my understanding that the Fotus armor is barely canon. The mention of 343i and Microsoft is likely just a little joke. --NightHammer(talk)(contribs) 20:55, 28 December 2015 (EST)