Forum:Removal of the Rollbacker usergroup?: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
==Comments== | ==Comments== | ||
Please comment here.-[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 17:33, 26 August 2017 (EDT) | Please comment here.-[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 17:33, 26 August 2017 (EDT) | ||
:I really need people to vote on this. As its very important. -[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 21:30, 28 August 2017 (EDT) |
Revision as of 21:30, August 28, 2017
Forums: Index → Community Proposal → Removal of the Rollbacker usergroup? |
Proposal
I am here to propose the removal of the Rollbacker usergroup.
Subtanks old proposal(as I agree with it)
There has been a proposal to remove this usergroup (and rank) and maintain only the Administration Team and the Patrollers. Honestly, I don't see much need for such usergroup since it's just skipping that one extra step to undo a revision to a page. I do not think the removal of such group would create any significant impact on its members as most of the them are inactive. — subtank 14:30, 11 July 2017 (EDT)
What I am suggesting
- Votes will be used to say yes or no to removing the Rollbacker usergroup.
- If the vote goes to the Usergroup being removed, internally Admins will discuss in a case by case scenario what to do with the existing Rollbackers what to do with them if they are active.
Votes
Please vote here!
Support (4/3) Sysop
Please use "# Support -" if you support this
- Support — Of course I support this as I submitted it. -CIA391 (talk) 17:33, 26 August 2017 (EDT)
- Support - Rollback as it currently stands is redundant.--Spartacus Talk • Contribs 17:36, 26 August 2017 (EDT)
- Support - -- Qura 'Morhek The Autocrat of Morheka 18:07, 26 August 2017 (EDT)
- Support - Yeah I agree.Sith Venator (Dank Memes) 01:28, 27 August 2017 (EDT)
Neutral (0/0) Sysop
Please use "# Neutral -" if you are neutral to this
Against (0/0) Sysop
Please use "# Oppose -" if you are opposed to this
Comments
Please comment here.-CIA391 (talk) 17:33, 26 August 2017 (EDT)