Forum:Removal of Project:Userbox and Userpages with Userboxes in them: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
m (Text replacement - "w:c:halofanon:" to "halofanon:") |
|||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Forumheader|Community Proposal}} | {{Forumheader|Community Proposal}} | ||
<!-- Please don't remove anything above this line, and put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please don't remove anything above this line, and put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
==Proposal== | ==Proposal== | ||
In relation to Phase 1 Step 1 of the [[Halopedia:Projects/Overall|Halopedia Improvement Project]] there is a substep that requires the need of wiping | In relation to Phase 1 Step 1 of the [[Halopedia:Projects/Overall|Halopedia Improvement Project]] there is a substep that requires the need of wiping Project:Userbox(Pretty much decommissioning of that project). And that is easy enough for the unused Userboxes. But the problem starts with the used ones. | ||
What I am asking permission for is two things. | What I am asking permission for is two things. | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
This allows me to 100% be fair in purging userboxes, and not surprise anyone.-[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 10:21, 30 July 2017 (EDT) | This allows me to 100% be fair in purging userboxes, and not surprise anyone.-[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 10:21, 30 July 2017 (EDT) | ||
'''Edit''': Its more so we can do a near total refresh of the backbone of the wiki, as the Userboxes became very outdated and messy over the last few years, and newer users don't even use them. So wiping them became a good idea in my eyes. Even then, wiping them now allows us to restart later with a clean slate if we decided to bring them back, something I was considering I admit. | |||
==Comments== | ==Comments== | ||
Please comment. I am sure there is lots to consider.-[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 10:21, 30 July 2017 (EDT) | Please comment. I am sure there is lots to consider.-[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 10:21, 30 July 2017 (EDT) | ||
Wait, why do we need to remove userboxes? That is something that has allowed people to personalize their pages and express themselves for a while now. I mean I could just be in the dark here, but what is the plan and how do userboxes come into play here? | Wait, why do we need to remove userboxes? That is something that has allowed people to personalize their pages and express themselves for a while now. I mean I could just be in the dark here, but what is the plan and how do userboxes come into play here? [[User:Arcmind|<span style="color: #b30000;" title="">'''Arcmind'''</span>]] <sup>'''[[User talk:Arcmind|<span style="color:#EAC117>Execute long hold for reactivation.</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Arcmind|<span style="color:#EAC117">AI-COM/ACMD SIGNOFF</span>]]'''</sup> 10:44, 30 July 2017 (EDT) | ||
:Its more so we can do a near total refresh of the backbone of the wiki, as the Userboxes became very outdated and messy over the last few years, and newer users don't even use them. So wiping them became a good idea in my eyes. Even then, wiping them now allows us to restart later with a clean slate if we decided to bring them back, something I was considering I admit.-[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 11:04, 30 July 2017 (EDT) | |||
::Adding on to what CIA391 says, what we can do for users still interested in using userboxes is to create one userbox template which they can customise using special parameters. This can be implemented now if necessary.— <span style="font-size:14px; font-family:Arial;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 08:38, 31 July 2017 (EDT) | |||
==Votes== | ==Votes== | ||
*{{Support}} - Vote here.-[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 10:21, 30 July 2017 (EDT) | *{{Support}} - Vote here.-[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 10:21, 30 July 2017 (EDT) | ||
*{{support}} --[[User:Arcmind|<span style="color: #b30000;" title="">'''Arcmind'''</span>]] <sup>'''[[User talk:Arcmind|<span style="color:#EAC117>Execute long hold for reactivation.</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Arcmind|<span style="color:#EAC117">AI-COM/ACMD SIGNOFF</span>]]'''</sup> 11:12, 30 July 2017 (EDT) | |||
*{{support}} -- [[User:Morhek|<b><font color=indigo>Qura 'Morhek</font></b>]] [[halofanon:user:Specops306|<u><i><font color=blue><sup>The Autocrat</sup></font></i></u>]] [[User talk:Specops306|<u><i><font color=purple><sup>of Morheka</sup></font></i></u>]] 18:34, 30 July 2017 (EDT) | |||
*{{support}} — <span style="font-size:14px; font-family:Arial;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 08:38, 31 July 2017 (EDT) | |||
*{{Support}} – They always were an inelegant mess. {{User:Helianthus/Sig}} | |||
Latest revision as of 15:08, June 2, 2019
| Forums: Index → Community Proposal → Removal of Project:Userbox and Userpages with Userboxes in them |  |
Proposal
In relation to Phase 1 Step 1 of the Halopedia Improvement Project there is a substep that requires the need of wiping Project:Userbox(Pretty much decommissioning of that project). And that is easy enough for the unused Userboxes. But the problem starts with the used ones.
What I am asking permission for is two things.
- 1. A week site warning for all active users who still have Userboxes to remove them off their relevant pages.
- 2. Permission to remove or clear pages with Userboxes in them after said week is done.
This allows me to 100% be fair in purging userboxes, and not surprise anyone.-CIA391 (talk) 10:21, 30 July 2017 (EDT)
Edit: Its more so we can do a near total refresh of the backbone of the wiki, as the Userboxes became very outdated and messy over the last few years, and newer users don't even use them. So wiping them became a good idea in my eyes. Even then, wiping them now allows us to restart later with a clean slate if we decided to bring them back, something I was considering I admit.
Comments
Please comment. I am sure there is lots to consider.-CIA391 (talk) 10:21, 30 July 2017 (EDT)
Wait, why do we need to remove userboxes? That is something that has allowed people to personalize their pages and express themselves for a while now. I mean I could just be in the dark here, but what is the plan and how do userboxes come into play here? Arcmind Execute long hold for reactivation. AI-COM/ACMD SIGNOFF 10:44, 30 July 2017 (EDT)
- Its more so we can do a near total refresh of the backbone of the wiki, as the Userboxes became very outdated and messy over the last few years, and newer users don't even use them. So wiping them became a good idea in my eyes. Even then, wiping them now allows us to restart later with a clean slate if we decided to bring them back, something I was considering I admit.-CIA391 (talk) 11:04, 30 July 2017 (EDT)
- Adding on to what CIA391 says, what we can do for users still interested in using userboxes is to create one userbox template which they can customise using special parameters. This can be implemented now if necessary.— subtank 08:38, 31 July 2017 (EDT)
Votes
Support - Vote here.-CIA391 (talk) 10:21, 30 July 2017 (EDT)- Support --Arcmind Execute long hold for reactivation. AI-COM/ACMD SIGNOFF 11:12, 30 July 2017 (EDT)
- Support -- Qura 'Morhek The Autocrat of Morheka 18:34, 30 July 2017 (EDT)
- Support — subtank 08:38, 31 July 2017 (EDT)
- Support – They always were an inelegant mess. Helianthus — All right. Shoot!