Talk:Polymerized lithium niobocene: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:27, March 13, 2011

Rename

Halsey's journal clarifies that the material is called "polymerised lithium niobocene," and that it was developed to discharge static buildup after slipspace jumps. I'd move it, but I have a habit of mistaking things for other things lately... -- Specops306 ^Autocrat ^{Qur'a 'Morhek} 04:07, 10 November 2010 (EST)

Support

Support -- Specops306 ^Autocrat ^{Qur'a 'Morhek} 05:50, 12 November 2010 (EST)

Oppose

Comments

Sounds about right. Anybody else with the journal agree? Tuckerscreator^(stalk) 13:11, 11 November 2010 (EST)

That's what I gathered when I read the journal. --"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have." -Thomas Jefferson 16:45, 11 November 2010 (EST)

Technically, it's correct. Although changing the name would require us to reformat the article, since the current version describes the layer itself, as a component of MJOLNIR armor, while polymerised lithium niobocene is the material the said layer is made of. Would it be unnecessary redundancy to keep this one as it is and make another article to describe the material? I think not, considering how the MJOLNIR layer isn't its only application. --Jugus (Talk | Contribs) 07:24, 12 November 2010 (EST)

Couldn't we simply just have the section of the material in this article? - 5əb'7aŋk^(7alk) 10:28, 12 November 2010 (EST)

I agree with Subtank, while the vast majority of the article describes its use in MJOLNIR there is no reason to make a separate article for it's intended use and manufacture. There really isn't enough detail to warrant a whole page for four sentances. At least, that's my opinion.--Bruce2401 22:27, 13 March 2011 (EDT)

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 Technically, it's correct. Although changing the name would require us to reformat the article, since the current version describes the layer itself, as a component of MJOLNIR armor, while polymerised lithium niobocene is the material the said layer is made of. Would it be unnecessary redundancy to keep this one as it is and make another article to describe the material? I think not, considering how the MJOLNIR layer isn't its only application. --[[User:Jugus|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jugus|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]])</small> 07:24, 12 November 2010 (EST)
 :Couldn't we simply just have the section of the material in this article? - <font face="Century Gothic">[[User:Subtank|<font color="gold"><font color="#FF4F00">5</font>əb<font color="#FF4F00">'7</font>aŋk</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Subtank|<font color="#FF4F00">7alk</font>]])</sup></font> 10:28, 12 November 2010 (EST)
+: I agree with Subtank, while the vast majority of the article describes its use in MJOLNIR there is no reason to make a separate article for it's intended use and manufacture.  There really isn't enough detail to warrant a whole page for four sentances.  At least, that's my opinion.--[[User talk:Bruce2401|Bruce2401]] 22:27, 13 March 2011 (EDT)