Halopedia talk:Halopedia in the media: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 12:59, July 28, 2021

Any other mentions in the press? —This unsigned comment was made by Esemono (talk • contribs). Please sign your posts with ~~~~

None that we know of at this point. --ED_(talk)^(shockfront) 17:00, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Bungie News[edit]

For the record, I did not write that ad. I just posted it for a GamerFocus user who preferred to be anonymous. --Dragonclaws^(talk) 06:45, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

The link http://halo.bungie.net/News/Story.aspx?link=905FA5DF-8639-4A69-9C5A-5CF95AE5A0CA is broken =P Tesfan 20:27, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

*shrugs* Bungie keeps revamping their site and breaking all the links. --Dragonclaws^(talk) 06:18, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Here's it in the archive. --Dragonclaws^(talk) 19:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

GamePro[edit]

Is this notable enough? --Dragonclaws^(talk) 02:53, February 19, 2010 (UTC)

Order[edit]

Should the list be ordered with newer items on the top or on the bottom? The commented text instructs to put newer entries at the top, bur no one has ever done that. One of these needs to change: the list order or the instruction. --Dragonclaws^(talk) 12:08, April 14, 2019 (EDT)

Having newer entries at the bottom comes across as more logical to me, so I would vote changing the instruction. --Tacitus (talk) 05:19, April 15, 2019 (EDT)

Yea I seem some wikis do the newest to oldest but tbh it just comes off as awkward at times. What Tacitus said, Oldest to newest, seems the better option. I mean we "could" do a thing where "only" the newest item gets put to the top so folks can see the most recent time we were mentioned, but thats pushing stuff.-CIA391 (talk) 11:38, April 15, 2019 (EDT)

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 For the record, I did not write that ad. I just posted it for a GamerFocus user who preferred to be anonymous. --<b>[[User:Dragonclaws|<font color="#000000">Dragon<font color="#FF0000">c</font>laws</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Dragonclaws|<font color="#000000">talk</font>]])</sup></b> 06:45, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
-The link http://www.bungie.net/News/Story.aspx?link=905FA5DF-8639-4A69-9C5A-5CF95AE5A0CA is broken =P {{SUBST:Nosubst|Template:Signatures/Tesfan}} 20:27, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
+The link http://halo.bungie.net/News/Story.aspx?link=905FA5DF-8639-4A69-9C5A-5CF95AE5A0CA is broken =P Tesfan 20:27, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
 :<nowiki>*</nowiki>shrugs* Bungie keeps revamping their site and breaking all the links. --<b>[[User:Dragonclaws|<font color="#4D56B1">Dragon<font color="#F28500">c</font>laws</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Dragonclaws|<font color="#4D56B1">talk</font>]])</sup></b> 06:18, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 ==GamePro==
 Is [http://www.gamepro.com/article/features/214033/why-master-chief-is-so-interesting/ this] notable enough? --<b>[[User:Dragonclaws|<font color="#4D56B1">Dragon<font color="#F28500">c</font>laws</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Dragonclaws|<font color="#4D56B1">talk</font>]])</sup></b> 02:53, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
+==Order==
+Should the list be ordered with newer items on the top or on the bottom? The commented text instructs to put newer entries at the top, bur no one has ever done that. One of these needs to change: the list order or the instruction. --<b>[[User:Dragonclaws|<font color="#800080">Dragon<font color="#DE397E">c</font>laws</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Dragonclaws|<font color="#6600D8">talk</font>]])</sup></b> 12:08, April 14, 2019 (EDT)
+:Having newer entries at the bottom comes across as more logical to me, so I would vote changing the instruction. --[[User:Tacitus|Tacitus]] ([[User talk:Tacitus|talk]]) 05:19, April 15, 2019 (EDT)
+::Yea I seem some wikis do the newest to oldest but tbh it just comes off as awkward at times. What Tacitus said, Oldest to newest, seems the better option. I mean we "could" do a thing where "only" the newest item gets put to the top so folks can see the most recent time we were mentioned, but thats pushing stuff.-[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 11:38, April 15, 2019 (EDT)