Talk:Type-26 Ground Support Aircraft (Heretic): Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
m (→Support: clean up, replaced: {{EM Sig}} → EM) |
m (→Support: clean up, replaced: {{Signatures/Joem25}} → Joem25) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:{{Support}} I agree.[[User talk:Sith Venator|Sith Venator]] 16:15, 22 February 2009 (UTC) | :{{Support}} I agree.[[User talk:Sith Venator|Sith Venator]] 16:15, 22 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
:{{Support}} Great job bringing this up. | :{{Support}} Great job bringing this up. Joem25 23:28, 23 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
:{{Support}} Its simply a reskin of the Banshee, nothing different about it.[[User talk:Spartan 112|112]] 23:16, 11 March 2009 (UTC) | :{{Support}} Its simply a reskin of the Banshee, nothing different about it.[[User talk:Spartan 112|112]] 23:16, 11 March 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:47, March 21, 2018
Merging
I think this page should be merged with the normal Banshee, since the Separatist Phantom became a subsection of the Phantom. Arby116
Support
- Support I agree.Sith Venator 16:15, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support Great job bringing this up. Joem25 23:28, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support Its simply a reskin of the Banshee, nothing different about it.112 23:16, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
- SupportI agree --Milbert23 01:36, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Support Yes, just a complete reskin, nothing else. EM
- SupportI agree only if it retains all current info. Dragonblaze-052 02:15, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- Support They both have something to do with Banshees, yes? --General57Talk to me hereImage:Oromis-award.jpg | 30px | 01:14, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support As per Arbiter 116. User:Spirit of Fire/Sig 10:20, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support Why not? Its a reskin, it isn't an entirely new aircraft or anything. Useful Dave 15:54, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Neutral
- Neutral Not too sure. There's pros and cons for each argument. SevenCycles
- Neutral It's only used in a couple of levels, but it is pretty sweet Roker1039 02:32, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Against
- Oppose They shouldn't. JDNhunter
- Oppose It needs its own page because it has to do with the Heretics. Not the loyalist.
- Oppose - It is a Heretic Banshee. Why have a page about Turkey, which is not even related to Halo, and not have a page about the Heretic Banshee? Remember our all-include policy! —Kougermasters [Lt. Commander - Weapons Master - Veteran - Rollbacker] 00:02, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose It is the Heretic Banshee, why merge it to the Covenant Banshee?--Odysseas-Spartan53 07:19, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose If we merge the HERETIC banshee with the COVENANT banshee we might aswell mix the Heretic and Covenant articles too. Wr1ghty 17:19, 18 May 2009
Kougers: Because Halopedia isn't perfect, however our changes need to start somewhere. I suggest here.
Wr1ghty: No, the Covenant and the Heretics serve separate causes, but their Banshees are basically the same thing. Did you not see my point about the Loyalist and Separatist Phantoms? Arby116