Template talk:T: Difference between revisions

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

(propose getting rid of this template)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Pointless==
This template seems a bit pointless to me.[[User:user0|User0]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/User0|(contribs)]][[User talk:User0|(talk)]]</sup> 03:50, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
This template seems a bit pointless to me.[[User:user0|User0]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/User0|(contribs)]][[User talk:User0|(talk)]]</sup> 03:50, 8 June 2008 (UTC)


It seems like it's meant to be used as an incredibly hacky alternative to the common <nowiki>{{#if:{{param|}}}|...}}</nowiki> pattern. It's really just potentially confusing and also adds every page using it to [[:Category:Pages using duplicate arguments in template calls]]. I think it should be gotten rid of. [[User:Bobogoobo|Bobogoobo]] ([[User talk:Bobogoobo|talk]]) 23:00, July 24, 2020 (EDT)
:It seems like it's meant to be used as an incredibly hacky alternative to the common <nowiki>{{#if:{{param|}}}|...}}</nowiki> pattern. It's really just potentially confusing and also adds every page using it to [[:Category:Pages using duplicate arguments in template calls]]. I think it should be gotten rid of. [[User:Bobogoobo|Bobogoobo]] ([[User talk:Bobogoobo|talk]]) 23:00, July 24, 2020 (EDT)
 
::We on the team have a huge template overhaul planned soon where the admittedly "hacky" stuff will be mostly (if not entirely) phased out. :) This was one thing! Our goal with said overhaul is to make the templates easier to work with (with a whole sleuth of other bts stuff)
 
Its gonna take a whole while though.-[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 03:02, July 25, 2020 (EDT)

Revision as of 03:02, July 25, 2020

Pointless

This template seems a bit pointless to me.User0(contribs)(talk) 03:50, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

It seems like it's meant to be used as an incredibly hacky alternative to the common {{#if:{{param|}}}|...}} pattern. It's really just potentially confusing and also adds every page using it to Category:Pages using duplicate arguments in template calls. I think it should be gotten rid of. Bobogoobo (talk) 23:00, July 24, 2020 (EDT)
We on the team have a huge template overhaul planned soon where the admittedly "hacky" stuff will be mostly (if not entirely) phased out. :) This was one thing! Our goal with said overhaul is to make the templates easier to work with (with a whole sleuth of other bts stuff)

Its gonna take a whole while though.-CIA391 (talk) 03:02, July 25, 2020 (EDT)