Talk:Vindication-class light battleship: Difference between revisions

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

No edit summary
m (Reverted edits by Jugus (talk) to last revision by Erickyboo)
Line 3: Line 3:
:Only one that is canonically acceptable. Can't just "make one up". Unfortunately, not much information is available regarding these types of ships or their individual names. --[[User:Xamikaze330|Xamikaze330]] ([[User talk:Xamikaze330|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Xamikaze330|contribs]]) 17:34, 8 January 2013 (EST)Xamikaze330
:Only one that is canonically acceptable. Can't just "make one up". Unfortunately, not much information is available regarding these types of ships or their individual names. --[[User:Xamikaze330|Xamikaze330]] ([[User talk:Xamikaze330|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Xamikaze330|contribs]]) 17:34, 8 January 2013 (EST)Xamikaze330
::What I more meant was something like "Unidentified UNSC capital ship (armored)" or whatever, not pulling a random class name out of a hat. --[[User:WTRiker|WTRiker]] ([[User talk:WTRiker|talk]]) 13:21, 9 January 2013 (EST)
::What I more meant was something like "Unidentified UNSC capital ship (armored)" or whatever, not pulling a random class name out of a hat. --[[User:WTRiker|WTRiker]] ([[User talk:WTRiker|talk]]) 13:21, 9 January 2013 (EST)
==Carrier?==
Is it safe to assume that this ship is of an unidentified '''carrier''' class, according to [http://autodestructdigital.blogspot.com/2012/11/unsc-carrier.html this page]? Note that it also has the "in-atmosphere thrusters"... I know that concept art are not exactly a good source, things can change during development, but in this case there simply isn't any other information. [[User:Imrane-117|Imrane-117]] ([[User talk:Imrane-117|talk]]) 17:38, 7 July 2013 (EDT)
:I'll ask and see if I'm allowed to tell you what it is. All I can say for now is it's not safe to assume it's a carrier. - [[User:ScaleMaster117|ScaleMaster117]] ([[User talk:ScaleMaster117|talk]]) 21:17, 7 July 2013 (EDT)


==Wrong ship!==
==Wrong ship!==

Revision as of 04:59, May 15, 2014

Name

Can anyone think of a better name for this class? I find it sufficiently descriptive, but I also think we could possibly come up with a better name. --WTRiker (talk) 12:44, 8 January 2013 (EST)

Only one that is canonically acceptable. Can't just "make one up". Unfortunately, not much information is available regarding these types of ships or their individual names. --Xamikaze330 (talk|contribs) 17:34, 8 January 2013 (EST)Xamikaze330
What I more meant was something like "Unidentified UNSC capital ship (armored)" or whatever, not pulling a random class name out of a hat. --WTRiker (talk) 13:21, 9 January 2013 (EST)

Wrong ship!

The ship pictured here is actually the Poseidon-class. The Vindication-class is the one with the pointy spines sticking out the front. -ScaleMaster117 (talk) 22:50, 14 May 2014 (EDT)

Huh, I guess that makes the ship length seem realistic if this one is in fact the cruiser. Rather than rename the pages, I suggest that it would be easier if we just swapped information between pages. - NightHammer (talk) 22:55, 14 May 2014 (EDT)
Actually, now that I think about it, it would be easier to rename the pages so we do not have to go to each article and change the link. Any suggestions? - NightHammer (talk) 23:16, 14 May 2014 (EDT)
Interesting... concept art for the one with the spikes labels it as a "UNSC carrier" (well, the unofficial online gallery page does, anyways). I did just switch the pages around, so I hope you're sure about this. --Jugus (Talk | Contribs) 01:04, 15 May 2014 (EDT)
Alright, sorry about that. I did think that the flat top one was the carrier due to the fact that the infinity commissioning ceremony takes place on the flat top one. Kind of like a flying air craft carrier. Made sense, thanks to scale master for correction.Erickyboo (talk) 01:23, 15 May 2014 (EDT)