Talk:Requiem Campaign: Difference between revisions

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

(Created page with "==Rename== The battle is referred to as the "Requiem Campaign" in the new ''Escalation'' issue. Since that is more official than "Second Battle of Requiem", should we rename i...")
 
No edit summary
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Rename==
==Rename==
The battle is referred to as the "Requiem Campaign" in the new ''Escalation'' issue. Since that is more official than "Second Battle of Requiem", should we rename it? - [[User:NightHammer|NightHammer]] ([[User talk:NightHammer|talk]]) 22:47, 25 December 2014 (EST)
The battle is referred to as the "Requiem Campaign" in the new ''Escalation'' issue. Since that is more official than "Second Battle of Requiem", should we rename it? - [[User:NightHammer|NightHammer]] ([[User talk:NightHammer|talk]]) 22:47, 25 December 2014 (EST)
:Yeah, makes more sense.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 23:45, 25 December 2014 (EST)
::Ditto. [[User:Lord Susto|<span style="color:orange">Lord Susto</span>]] 00:16, 26 December 2014 (EST)
:::Forgot about this... so if no one else disagrees, I will rename it shortly. - [[User:NightHammer|NightHammer]] ([[User talk:NightHammer|talk]]) 21:03, 13 January 2015 (EST)
::::I agree with the proposal. Go for it, NightHammer. [[User:Noddy|Noddy]] ([[User talk:Noddy|talk]]) 21:42, 13 January 2015 (EST)
:::::Makes sense to me, feel free to do so.[[User:262VigilantGuardian|262VigilantGuardian]] ([[User talk:262VigilantGuardian|talk]]) 22:02, 13 January 2015 (EST)
::::::I'll do it.[[User:Sith Venator|<span style="color:green">Sith-venator Wavingstrider</span>]] [[File:Fett helmet.jpg|20px]] ([[User talk:Sith Venator|<span style="color:blue">Commlink</span>]]) 22:17, 13 January 2015 (EST)
:::::::Then, we have to rename the First Battle of Requiem to just "Battle of Requiem", don't you think? --[[User:Dr Mutran|They&#39;re coming. They&#39;re hungry.]] ([[User talk:Dr Mutran|talk]]) 00:01, 14 January 2015 (EST)
::::::::Make it so. [[User:Lord Susto|<span style="color:orange">Lord Susto</span>]] 00:05, 14 January 2015 (EST)
:::::::::Agreed. - [[User:NightHammer|NightHammer]] ([[User talk:NightHammer|talk]]) 00:07, 14 January 2015 (EST)
All of those redirects now... *shivers* [[User:Noddy|Noddy]] ([[User talk:Noddy|talk]]) 00:38, 14 January 2015 (EST)

Latest revision as of 01:38, January 14, 2015

Rename[edit]

The battle is referred to as the "Requiem Campaign" in the new Escalation issue. Since that is more official than "Second Battle of Requiem", should we rename it? - NightHammer (talk) 22:47, 25 December 2014 (EST)

Yeah, makes more sense.--Spartacus TalkContribs 23:45, 25 December 2014 (EST)
Ditto. Lord Susto 00:16, 26 December 2014 (EST)
Forgot about this... so if no one else disagrees, I will rename it shortly. - NightHammer (talk) 21:03, 13 January 2015 (EST)
I agree with the proposal. Go for it, NightHammer. Noddy (talk) 21:42, 13 January 2015 (EST)
Makes sense to me, feel free to do so.262VigilantGuardian (talk) 22:02, 13 January 2015 (EST)
I'll do it.Sith-venator Wavingstrider Fett helmet.jpg (Commlink) 22:17, 13 January 2015 (EST)
Then, we have to rename the First Battle of Requiem to just "Battle of Requiem", don't you think? --They're coming. They're hungry. (talk) 00:01, 14 January 2015 (EST)
Make it so. Lord Susto 00:05, 14 January 2015 (EST)
Agreed. - NightHammer (talk) 00:07, 14 January 2015 (EST)

All of those redirects now... *shivers* Noddy (talk) 00:38, 14 January 2015 (EST)