Talk:Point Blank-class prowler: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
No edit summary |
(Possibility of Falsehood) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
No it is not. A UNSC Prowler is much smaller than a Destroyer. The exsictance of this type of ship is undeniable. Please read Ghosts of Onyx. --[[User:UNSC AI|Will]] 20:55, 4 January 2007 (UTC) | No it is not. A UNSC Prowler is much smaller than a Destroyer. The exsictance of this type of ship is undeniable. Please read Ghosts of Onyx. --[[User:UNSC AI|Will]] 20:55, 4 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
:yes. Cheers, <tt>[[user:RelentlessRecusant|49 Proximal Secant]]<sup><nowiki>[</nowiki>[[User talk:RelentlessRecusant|oracle]]<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup></tt>[[Image:H3 Monitor.PNG|25px]] 17:33, 6 January 2007 (UTC) | :yes. Cheers, <tt>[[user:RelentlessRecusant|49 Proximal Secant]]<sup><nowiki>[</nowiki>[[User talk:RelentlessRecusant|oracle]]<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup></tt>[[Image:H3 Monitor.PNG|25px]] 17:33, 6 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
== Possibility of Falsehood == | |||
Some of the specs posted in the ship's chart maybe incorrect. I'm openly admitting this, becuase since it is a ''Prowler''-class i used some info from normal [[Powler]]s. Althought this is just a possiblty cause i assumed things, but everything else is correct. Just there may be some flasehoods in the chart. --[[Shch 'Nodotee]] [[Image:Donut 7.JPG|35px]] 01:22, 31 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:22, January 30, 2007
This isn't a UNSC Prowler? --Omrifere 00:43, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
No it is not. A UNSC Prowler is much smaller than a Destroyer. The exsictance of this type of ship is undeniable. Please read Ghosts of Onyx. --Will 20:55, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- yes. Cheers, 49 Proximal Secant[oracle]File:H3 Monitor.PNG 17:33, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Possibility of Falsehood
Some of the specs posted in the ship's chart maybe incorrect. I'm openly admitting this, becuase since it is a Prowler-class i used some info from normal Powlers. Althought this is just a possiblty cause i assumed things, but everything else is correct. Just there may be some flasehoods in the chart. --Shch 'Nodotee File:Donut 7.JPG 01:22, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
