Talk:Achievements (Halo: The Master Chief Collection): Difference between revisions

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:


:I agree in concept, but maybe not quite to that degree. Maybe all of the "Complete [INSERT LEVEL HERE]" or Chips Dubbo sort of achievements could get one single article for each group of them? One page would get ''very'' crowded with 400 pictures (even as thumbnails), and all the trivia entries for all the references to other things or whatever else. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] ([[User talk:Alex T Snow|talk]]) 17:08, 1 November 2014 (EDT)
:I agree in concept, but maybe not quite to that degree. Maybe all of the "Complete [INSERT LEVEL HERE]" or Chips Dubbo sort of achievements could get one single article for each group of them? One page would get ''very'' crowded with 400 pictures (even as thumbnails), and all the trivia entries for all the references to other things or whatever else. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] ([[User talk:Alex T Snow|talk]]) 17:08, 1 November 2014 (EDT)
:Barring concerns for page size, we could use the feature list template for each individual achievement warranting a guide or special notes instead of having to create more articles. {{User:Helianthus/Sig}}


==Images==
==Images==

Revision as of 19:38, November 1, 2014

Future

I think we should wait to make the separate achievement pages, at least until we get images for each one or the game comes out. Additionally, I have linked to several redirects in this article that happen to have the same title as an achievement (such as Chieftain of the Brutes). When we do get around to creating articles for each one, I think we should simply use the redirect for the achievement's article and provide a "Were you looking for..." at the top linking to the page the redirect was formerly directing to. - NightHammer (talk) 01:00, 11 October 2014 (EDT)

I agree. Having a list should be fine for now. -- SFH (talk) 01:31, 11 October 2014 (EDT)

I was wondering if we could just avoid making separate, individual pages for achievements and just place redirects to this hub article. It seems that the current gaming development practice when it comes to achievements (at least for 343i) is to oversupply the achievements to a point of redundancy. Achievements such as as "Complete [INSERT LEVEL HERE]", "Get [X] points/kills" and my personal peeve "Win [X] multiplayer games" are content that do not need their own articles since they are evidently self-explanatory from the title of the achievements. The only achievements that do need their own articles are the ones that require careful and/or specific instructions in order to achieve that achievement. Looking at the current list for MCC, I don't see any worthwhile achievements that needs an article save for the "Mystery Achievement". — subtank 03:33, 1 November 2014 (EDT)

I agree in concept, but maybe not quite to that degree. Maybe all of the "Complete [INSERT LEVEL HERE]" or Chips Dubbo sort of achievements could get one single article for each group of them? One page would get very crowded with 400 pictures (even as thumbnails), and all the trivia entries for all the references to other things or whatever else. Alex T Snow (talk) 17:08, 1 November 2014 (EDT)
Barring concerns for page size, we could use the feature list template for each individual achievement warranting a guide or special notes instead of having to create more articles. Helianthus All right. Shoot!

Images

I know that some of these images have already been uploaded, but I'm pretty sure it's not the case for all of them. I'm keeping this link here, just in case. It might also be useful for other articles that have nothing to do with the achievements, I see several good illustrations for other things. http://imgur.com/a/a04ys (These are images for TMCC's achievements, in case you hadn't seen them yet). Imrane-117 (talk) 13:25, 23 October 2014 (EDT)

Short 10 points

I was adding the achievements to my achievement-tracking Excel spreadsheet and the count was 400, but the sum came up 3990, meaning that an achievement is under-scored by 10. It's late here, otherwise I'd check for it myself. *passes out* --WTRiker (talk) 01:50, 31 October 2014 (EDT)

  • Found it. Medal Completionist was shorted 10 points. --WTRiker (talk) 14:15, 31 October 2014 (EDT)