Talk:ANVIL Station: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
(Just more curious why we removed it.) |
NightHammer (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==''Halo 5''== | |||
Um forgive me for asking, but where does it say Halo 5 has this station? --[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 20:18, 25 March 2015 (GMT) | Um forgive me for asking, but where does it say Halo 5 has this station? --[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 20:18, 25 March 2015 (GMT) | ||
:I don't think it was explicitly stated that Anvil and the ''Halo 5'' station were one and the same. Unless there is a confirmation, I would avoid saying that. We don't know how many training facilities / space stations the S-IVs have at their disposal. [[User:Imrane-117|Imrane-117]] ([[User talk:Imrane-117|talk]]) 16:41, 25 March 2015 (EDT) | :I don't think it was explicitly stated that Anvil and the ''Halo 5'' station were one and the same. Unless there is a confirmation, I would avoid saying that. We don't know how many training facilities / space stations the S-IVs have at their disposal. [[User:Imrane-117|Imrane-117]] ([[User talk:Imrane-117|talk]]) 16:41, 25 March 2015 (EDT) | ||
| Line 6: | Line 7: | ||
[[File:Anvil Station Blueprint.png|thumb|300px]] | [[File:Anvil Station Blueprint.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
Well the image that has this is the only source we have. Shouldn't we follow it by the letter till another source goes into more detail. I mean it hasnt stopped us saying 343 Industries made the Fotus armor. And Microsoft must still be a company in the future. I mean its symbol does appear in a easter egg also on a Halo Map also. So I dont see why we should take out that they helped develop this station. --[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 23:25, 28 December 2015 (GMT) | Well the image that has this is the only source we have. Shouldn't we follow it by the letter till another source goes into more detail. I mean it hasnt stopped us saying 343 Industries made the Fotus armor. And Microsoft must still be a company in the future. I mean its symbol does appear in a easter egg also on a Halo Map also. So I dont see why we should take out that they helped develop this station. --[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 23:25, 28 December 2015 (GMT) | ||
:It's my understanding that the Fotus armor is barely canon. The mention of 343i and Microsoft is likely just a little joke. --[[User:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">'''NightHammer'''</span>]]''<sup>[[User talk:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(talk)</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(contribs)</span>]]</sup>'' 20:55, 28 December 2015 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 21:55, December 28, 2015
Halo 5
Um forgive me for asking, but where does it say Halo 5 has this station? --CIA391 (talk) 20:18, 25 March 2015 (GMT)
- I don't think it was explicitly stated that Anvil and the Halo 5 station were one and the same. Unless there is a confirmation, I would avoid saying that. We don't know how many training facilities / space stations the S-IVs have at their disposal. Imrane-117 (talk) 16:41, 25 March 2015 (EDT)
343 Industries and Microsoft helped develop Anvil
Well the image that has this is the only source we have. Shouldn't we follow it by the letter till another source goes into more detail. I mean it hasnt stopped us saying 343 Industries made the Fotus armor. And Microsoft must still be a company in the future. I mean its symbol does appear in a easter egg also on a Halo Map also. So I dont see why we should take out that they helped develop this station. --CIA391 (talk) 23:25, 28 December 2015 (GMT)
- It's my understanding that the Fotus armor is barely canon. The mention of 343i and Microsoft is likely just a little joke. --NightHammer(talk)(contribs) 20:55, 28 December 2015 (EST)