Forum:Next to ever characters age we should mention if they experienced Cryogenic Slumber or not: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
Imrane-117 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Covenant PhD (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:"Physical age" doesn't make much sense, age is supposed to be calculated depending on one's date of birth. As for characters like Buck and Lasky, we only point out a character's age if he's dead. This is due to complications such as, is this character still alive, what year do we take into account? etc. [[User:Imrane-117|Imrane-117]] ([[User talk:Imrane-117|talk]]) 20:20, 28 April 2016 (EDT) | :"Physical age" doesn't make much sense, age is supposed to be calculated depending on one's date of birth. As for characters like Buck and Lasky, we only point out a character's age if he's dead. This is due to complications such as, is this character still alive, what year do we take into account? etc. [[User:Imrane-117|Imrane-117]] ([[User talk:Imrane-117|talk]]) 20:20, 28 April 2016 (EDT) | ||
:The physical age is important as it's not just appearance but conscious life experience too. Were a one year old cryogenically frozen for 80 years, they would still come out with the mindset and maturity of a one year old. I think it might be important to note cryogenic sleep alongside their date of birth. | |||
Revision as of 20:43, April 28, 2016
| Forums: Index → Community Proposal → Next to ever characters age we should mention if they experienced Cryogenic Slumber or not |  |
Certain characters like Edward Buck and Thomas Lasky are almost 50 yet look significantly younger due to having Cryo Sleep for prolonged periods of time (over a year at least). Characters such as Sergeant Johnson are 70/80 years old, while they look MUCH younger than they are, with Johnson especially, next to his date of birth we should mention that he has experienced cryogenic slumber).
I propose that we list in brackets (physical age different due to cryogenic slumber) or something like that. —This unsigned comment was made by Editorguy (talk • contribs). Please sign your posts with ~~~~
- "Physical age" doesn't make much sense, age is supposed to be calculated depending on one's date of birth. As for characters like Buck and Lasky, we only point out a character's age if he's dead. This is due to complications such as, is this character still alive, what year do we take into account? etc. Imrane-117 (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2016 (EDT)
- The physical age is important as it's not just appearance but conscious life experience too. Were a one year old cryogenically frozen for 80 years, they would still come out with the mindset and maturity of a one year old. I think it might be important to note cryogenic sleep alongside their date of birth.