ScaleMaster117's board

I still don't consider female Noble Six non-canon until it is stated somewhere that his gender is male, which the EVG does not.

Out of curiosity, does the Story Bible assign names to any of the known destroyer classes (particularly the standard arrowhead-shaped version)? I know you can't reveal any of the names without permission from 343 Industries, of course. I've just wondered for a while whether or not any designations have been established.

Thanks for the clarification, I was just asking 'cause before this information was released I had a fanon write-up of Six on Halo Fanon at roughly 7'01"; 291 (I dunno why but I always imagined him as being a bit physically larger than Chief) wasn't intending on putting it on here though :P, was just wondering if that would make it non-canon. I was going to alleviate that issue and say that was his height and weight just after augmentation at age 14, and not his current height and weight indicating he'd grown a bit since then.

Say we wanted to make a fanon version of Noble Six, could we, since on the official website (here: http://halo.bungie.net/projects/reach/article.aspx?ucc=personnel&cid=24527) and other sources Noble Six has been presented as a template character with any and all information blacked our or classified, substitute our own backstory and information with the presumption that the information fed to us is all either ONI/UNSC propaganda and/or incorrect? This includes name, ht/wt, gender, service record, etc. Also this question is directed at you and won't accept an answer from anyone else.

Okay good, we got all that confusion out of the way.

Okay so the "super scarab" is not the H2 Scarab. That equals out to: Type-36 Scarab being only in Halo Wars. Type-47 Scarab being in Halo 2, Halo 3, Halo Wars, Halo 3: ODST, and Halo: Reach.

So basically, if I'm hearing you correctly, this is what we'll have if 343 goes for the Type-36 being the H2/Super Scarab. Type-36 Scarab appearing in Halo 2 and Halo Wars. Type-47 Scarab appearing in Halo 3, Halo Wars, Halo 3: ODST, and Halo: Reach.

[1] The Scarab page splits the two known Scarab models into subsections referring to the Halo 2/Super Scarab model as the V1 and the Halo 3/Wars/ODST/Reach version as the V2. Judging by the source this is information from the, you guessed it, Halo Encyclopedia.

Well since it is mentioned in the Guide I suppose it deserves an article. However you kind of didn't answer my question whether or not the Halo 2 Scarab (V1 Type-47 Scarab) is the same kind as the Type-36 Scarab, the Type-47 Ultra Heavy Assault Platform page assumes that the V1 and "Super Scarab", now Type-36, are the same model. Doing a little digging through the Scarab (level) article it seems the user who created the page made the notion that they were the same model based on its appearance and health.

I was actually under the assumption that the "Super Scarab" in Halo Wars is actually just a V1.

Hey, what is the Type-36? Is that something for the V1 model of the Scarab or something? What is it?

Nice work!

I am, too. Very extremely obsessed. Haven't really decided if it's a good thing or a bad thing. Good thing, it isn't my idol, if you catch my drift. Doesn't really matter if you don't. But I'm sure you do. ;-)

Just out of curiosity, are you looking forward to and interested in Destiny?

Thanks. Would there be any weight difference depending on Six's gender? Judging by this image, male and female Six appear to be the same height, but female Six is much thinner.

Do you have any info on the height and weight of Noble Six?

There we go. Convert template now shows the correct numbers.

I'm not sure if I should offer my apology since it has been a wiki practice to use the Template:Convert for all conversions. As far as I know, the Convert template uses the same conversion calculation used in Wikipedia since it was imported from there, and as such, in addition to the fact that Wikipedians have this perfectionist tendency with their templates/edits, any error or miscalculation should be extremely minimal, if not absent.

Now that you've informed me that the figures are in Imperial by default, I shall continue by applying the convert template once again, but with Imperial in the first field parameters than in the second. It should convert the figures into Metric accurately and as precise as a mathematical calculator.

Anyway, since my contributions with the templatees have been reverted by the admins, and you've written a response, please accept this apology from me.

What I meant to say was, that is all good to know. I hadn't realized that before. As I said in my previous message, it doesn't really matter, we already have some pretty good images of some of those other things. Get what you can, and I greatly appreciate your help. And when you do get a copy of Halo: Reach, let me know. Thanks again. :-)

You're Welcome.

Oh, and sorry if it seems a bit much that I'm looking for. The Halo Waypoint images are good, but they lack in larger sizes, no offense. In-game images work well.

It's on my talk page, and it's also here on one of my special userpages. Sorry for repeat message. And yes, I meant in multiplayer.

Splendid. Looks like someone added it to the article already. Thanks once again.

On a note related to our recent discussions, would you happen to have a graphic of the Seventh Fleet emblem handy we could use in our Seventh Fleet article?

Thank you for clearing up that nagging little issue. Overall, remember, wherever you see something wrong, don't hesitate to correct us. Having been here for quite a while, I've come to see just how many mistakes have snuck in over the years. We're trying to correct these to our best ability, but with this kind of a page/editor ratio we can only do so much. That, and not everyone is a walking Halo encyclopedia so they usually won't spot the more technical details.

And feel absolutely free to add the heights to the ships. If the length and width are regarded as canon, it only stands to reason that the same applies to the height. As for the citation format, we list the game (or any other piece of media in question) in bold and then the more precise source in italics - for example: <ref>'''Halo 3''' ''game files''</ref>. Hope that helps.