Talk:M6H magnum: Difference between revisions

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:


#{{Support}} - Per the cabal. ;)--[[File:Main-Superintendent.png|15px|link=User:Spartacus]] <span style="color: #7BA05B; font-weight:bold; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt;"><tt>KEEP IT CLEAN</tt></span> <sup>[[User talk:Spartacus|<font color="Black"><u>'''Comm Line'''</u></font>]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Spartacus|<font color="Black"><u>'''Transmissions'''</u></font>]]</sub> 16:46, 4 June 2012 (EDT)
#{{Support}} - Per the cabal. ;)--[[File:Main-Superintendent.png|15px|link=User:Spartacus]] <span style="color: #7BA05B; font-weight:bold; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt;"><tt>KEEP IT CLEAN</tt></span> <sup>[[User talk:Spartacus|<font color="Black"><u>'''Comm Line'''</u></font>]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Spartacus|<font color="Black"><u>'''Transmissions'''</u></font>]]</sub> 16:46, 4 June 2012 (EDT)
==List of appearances==
It has been mentioned on ODST Field Guide page, which is in the sources for the article, but not in appearances. That isn't considered as canon? [[User talk:PatrickRus|PatrickRus]] 19:29, 8 June 2012 (EDT)

Revision as of 19:29, June 8, 2012

Merge

Yeah, I noticed there was another M6H after I created the article. However the M6H PDWS was shown on Waypoint and from what I see, it was manufactured ad put into service after 2555, but this other M6H Handgun seems to have been made before 2555.--Main-Superintendent.png KEEP IT CLEAN Comm Line Transmissions 16:26, 4 June 2012 (EDT)

  1. Support.svg Support — The 2555 date doesn't mean much. It didn't specify that the 6H was introduced, rather, it simply became the new standard. Grizzlei
  1. Support.svg Support - As per Grizzlei. -Kronos101 16:44, 4 June 2012 (EDT)
  1. Support.svg Support - Per the cabal. ;)--Main-Superintendent.png KEEP IT CLEAN Comm Line Transmissions 16:46, 4 June 2012 (EDT)

List of appearances

It has been mentioned on ODST Field Guide page, which is in the sources for the article, but not in appearances. That isn't considered as canon? PatrickRus 19:29, 8 June 2012 (EDT)