Editing Talk:FFG-045
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:::If it's really a frigate, then we may consider the "0" to be an oversight, it makes me remember Soren's case. In Halo: Evolutions, he's (erroneously) referred to as Soren-66, but Halopedia safely chose to call him Soren-066 because it's the correct way to name Spartans. 343i let the UNSC Pillar of Autumn be called a frigate in Halo 4, so I assume they wouldn't even think that FFG-045 is a mistake. (Well I don't necessarily ''blame'' them, it's not the first time that so-caled "details" are messed up. What's important is to correct it here.) In this particular case, I still think FFG means that's a frigate, it would be too far-fetched for it to mean something else, though that's just my opinion. For now, I suggest we change the page from "045" to "45" (since it's the correct naming convention), and we may mention the error in the article.[[User:Imrane-117|Imrane-117]] ([[User talk:Imrane-117|talk]]) 20:40, 20 June 2013 (EDT) | :::If it's really a frigate, then we may consider the "0" to be an oversight, it makes me remember Soren's case. In Halo: Evolutions, he's (erroneously) referred to as Soren-66, but Halopedia safely chose to call him Soren-066 because it's the correct way to name Spartans. 343i let the UNSC Pillar of Autumn be called a frigate in Halo 4, so I assume they wouldn't even think that FFG-045 is a mistake. (Well I don't necessarily ''blame'' them, it's not the first time that so-caled "details" are messed up. What's important is to correct it here.) In this particular case, I still think FFG means that's a frigate, it would be too far-fetched for it to mean something else, though that's just my opinion. For now, I suggest we change the page from "045" to "45" (since it's the correct naming convention), and we may mention the error in the article.[[User:Imrane-117|Imrane-117]] ([[User talk:Imrane-117|talk]]) 20:40, 20 June 2013 (EDT) | ||