Talk:Subject 386: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
Ultra Force (talk | contribs) m (Reverted edits by Butthead4 (Talk) to last version by Nerfherder1428) |
m (→Ship type: removed: 35px) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
So if FoR identifies the vessel 386 was captured from as an assault carrier, but Genesis shows a unique ship design, should the article reflect one or the other? Or should the discrepancy be noted somewhere in the article? | So if FoR identifies the vessel 386 was captured from as an assault carrier, but Genesis shows a unique ship design, should the article reflect one or the other? Or should the discrepancy be noted somewhere in the article? | ||
'''<span style="font-family: Tahoma; color: MidnightBlue;"> // [[User:Stryker117|<font color="MidnightBlue">ŝтŕγκęŕ</font>]]</span>''' <small>[ [[User talk:Stryker117|<font color="SteelBlue">COM</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Stryker117|<font color="SteelBlue">LOG/M</font>]] | [[Special:Editcount/Stryker117|<font color="SteelBlue">LOG/S</font>]] ]</small> 04:24, August 22, 2010 (UTC) | |||
: Not sure, but maybe Assault carier is a broad term, similair to calling something a truck. Many different car models fall under the category "truck". [[User:FatalSnipe117|<span style="color:purple">'''Que'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/FatalSnipe117|<span style="color:red">'''Sera'''</span>]], [[User talk:FatalSnipe117|<span style="color:orange">'''Sera'''</span>]] 04:26, August 22, 2010 (UTC) | : Not sure, but maybe Assault carier is a broad term, similair to calling something a truck. Many different car models fall under the category "truck". [[User:FatalSnipe117|<span style="color:purple">'''Que'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/FatalSnipe117|<span style="color:red">'''Sera'''</span>]], [[User talk:FatalSnipe117|<span style="color:orange">'''Sera'''</span>]] 04:26, August 22, 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Although the picture sort of implies that the unique vessel is indeed the ship that produced 386, it does not explicitly state it at all. It's just the only ship shown in the frame depicting the skirmish. But this ship may be one of the two destroyed during the battle. With this in mind, it may be best to use the explicit canon(FoR) only.--[[User talk:Nerfherder1428|Nerfherder1428]] 04:34, August 22, 2010 (UTC) | ::Although the picture sort of implies that the unique vessel is indeed the ship that produced 386, it does not explicitly state it at all. It's just the only ship shown in the frame depicting the skirmish. But this ship may be one of the two destroyed during the battle. With this in mind, it may be best to use the explicit canon(FoR) only.--[[User talk:Nerfherder1428|Nerfherder1428]] 04:34, August 22, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:10, January 15, 2019
Ship type[edit]
So if FoR identifies the vessel 386 was captured from as an assault carrier, but Genesis shows a unique ship design, should the article reflect one or the other? Or should the discrepancy be noted somewhere in the article?
// ŝтŕγκęŕ [ COM | LOG/M | LOG/S ] 04:24, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Not sure, but maybe Assault carier is a broad term, similair to calling something a truck. Many different car models fall under the category "truck". Que Sera, Sera 04:26, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Although the picture sort of implies that the unique vessel is indeed the ship that produced 386, it does not explicitly state it at all. It's just the only ship shown in the frame depicting the skirmish. But this ship may be one of the two destroyed during the battle. With this in mind, it may be best to use the explicit canon(FoR) only.--Nerfherder1428 04:34, August 22, 2010 (UTC)