Talk:Skywalker Sound: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
(Orderly fashion, people!) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
===Support=== | ===Support=== | ||
{{support}} ^^What he said^^Vegerot goes RAWR! [[File:Icon-Vegito2.gif|21px]] [[User:Vegerot|<span style="color:midnightblue; font-weight:bold">Vegerot</span>]] ([[User talk:Vegerot|<span style="color:grey">talk</span>]]) 22:53, 19 September 2011 (EDT)!!! | |||
===Neutral=== | ===Neutral=== | ||
===Oppose=== | ===Oppose=== | ||
Revision as of 22:53, September 19, 2011
Closing the floodgate
I think I see a flood of entities getting their own article in Halopedia soon. While all these companies and studios are worthy of having their own article, I think that if they have their own Wikipedia article, then let Wikipedia handle it (and a link to that article provided). However, there is an exception to this personal rule of mine; only official parties that have contribute significantly and frequently to the Halo dsevelopment should be awarded their own article. Of course, 343 Industries and Bungie would fall in this category. This is simply to avoid dead articles, such as Production I.G and Studio 4°C. A list of companies can be found here. — subtank 14:50, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
- Okay, I understand your reasoning. So will this article be deleted?--Brute Honour Guard
("Talk") 14:55, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
- Well, I think it should. Don't know if anyone else disagrees.— subtank 14:59, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
I agree, unless the article has the potential to expand, or has information that can't be covered on its Wikipedia page. Some kind of restriction would be good, there's been plenty of wikis where people go overboard with articles like these. Tuckerscreator(stalk) 19:35, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
Support
Support ^^What he said^^Vegerot goes RAWR! File:Icon-Vegito2.gif Vegerot (talk) 22:53, 19 September 2011 (EDT)!!!
