Talk:AV-22 Sparrowhawk: Difference between revisions

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

(Fans)
Line 17: Line 17:


::Agreed. [[User:Bullitt Time|Bullitt Time]] 19:52, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
::Agreed. [[User:Bullitt Time|Bullitt Time]] 19:52, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
== Fans ==
they had this conversation over at the HaloWars forums, but the fans on a future aircraft do make sense. they're probably cheaper to make than jet engines, and because the craft probably is going to be hovering a helluva lot more than even a Pelican, fans would be better for this purpose than jet engines. just saying. -- [[User:Specops306|SpecOps306]] 03:40, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:40, March 14, 2007

looks more like commander tony wanted 2 include a fictional template thing —This unsigned comment was made by Forerunner (talkcontribs). Please sign your posts with ~~~~

All of my pics and information comes from this:

http://forums.halowars.com/thread/42345.aspx

All of the weapons come from speculation that is probably right CommanderTony 17:34, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Ohh...lemme check. =D Cheers, Ghost Inside the Machine (Whisper through the Storm) (My Journeys) (Omens) 17:35, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Wow...crap, that's nice! =D CHeers, Ghost Inside the Machine (Whisper through the Storm) (My Journeys) (Omens) 17:36, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Kestrel and Sparrowhawk

Sparrohawk is another word for American Kestrel and I believe the vehicles are one and the same. The entries should be combined. Bullitt Time 19:02, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

The Sparrowhawk is probably older than the Deleted Kestrel. So, I do not think it should be merged together until we get some clear details on how it operates. CommanderTony (19:37, 11 March 2007 (UTC))
Agreed. Bullitt Time 19:52, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Fans

they had this conversation over at the HaloWars forums, but the fans on a future aircraft do make sense. they're probably cheaper to make than jet engines, and because the craft probably is going to be hovering a helluva lot more than even a Pelican, fans would be better for this purpose than jet engines. just saying. -- SpecOps306 03:40, 15 March 2007 (UTC)