Talk:Skywalker Sound: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I think I see a flood of entities getting their own article in Halopedia soon. While all these companies and studios are worthy of having their own article, I think that if they have their own Wikipedia article, then let Wikipedia handle it (and a link to that article provided). However, there is an exception to this personal rule of mine; only official parties that have contribute ''significantly'' and ''frequently'' to the Halo dsevelopment should be awarded their own article. Of course, 343 Industries and Bungie would fall in this category. This is simply to avoid dead articles, such as [[Production I.G]] and [[Studio 4°C]]. A list of companies can be found [[:Category:Companies|here]]. — <span style="font-size:16px; font-family:OrbitronMedium;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 14:50, 19 September 2011 (EDT) | I think I see a flood of entities getting their own article in Halopedia soon. While all these companies and studios are worthy of having their own article, I think that if they have their own Wikipedia article, then let Wikipedia handle it (and a link to that article provided). However, there is an exception to this personal rule of mine; only official parties that have contribute ''significantly'' and ''frequently'' to the Halo dsevelopment should be awarded their own article. Of course, 343 Industries and Bungie would fall in this category. This is simply to avoid dead articles, such as [[Production I.G]] and [[Studio 4°C]]. A list of companies can be found [[:Category:Companies|here]]. — <span style="font-size:16px; font-family:OrbitronMedium;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 14:50, 19 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
:Okay, I understand your reasoning. So will this article be deleted?--[[User:Brute Honour Guard|<span style="color:red">Brute Honour Guard</span>]] [[Image:HGBrute.jpg|20px]] ([[User talk:Brute Honour Guard|<span style="color:orange">"Talk"</span>]]) 14:55, 19 September 2011 (EDT) | :Okay, I understand your reasoning. So will this article be deleted?--[[User:Brute Honour Guard|<span style="color:red">Brute Honour Guard</span>]] [[Image:HGBrute.jpg|20px]] ([[User talk:Brute Honour Guard|<span style="color:orange">"Talk"</span>]]) 14:55, 19 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
::Well, I think it should. Don't know if anyone else disagrees.— <span style="font-size:16px; font-family:OrbitronMedium;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 14:59, 19 September 2011 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 14:59, September 19, 2011
Closing the floodgate
I think I see a flood of entities getting their own article in Halopedia soon. While all these companies and studios are worthy of having their own article, I think that if they have their own Wikipedia article, then let Wikipedia handle it (and a link to that article provided). However, there is an exception to this personal rule of mine; only official parties that have contribute significantly and frequently to the Halo dsevelopment should be awarded their own article. Of course, 343 Industries and Bungie would fall in this category. This is simply to avoid dead articles, such as Production I.G and Studio 4°C. A list of companies can be found here. — subtank 14:50, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
- Okay, I understand your reasoning. So will this article be deleted?--Brute Honour Guard
("Talk") 14:55, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
- Well, I think it should. Don't know if anyone else disagrees.— subtank 14:59, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
