Forum:Removal of the Rollbacker usergroup?: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
NightHammer (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
#{{Support}} - -- [[User:Morhek|<b><font color=indigo>Qura 'Morhek</font></b>]] [[w:c:halofanon:user:Specops306|<u><i><font color=blue><sup>The Autocrat</sup></font></i></u>]] [[User talk:Specops306|<u><i><font color=purple><sup>of Morheka</sup></font></i></u>]] 18:07, 26 August 2017 (EDT) | #{{Support}} - -- [[User:Morhek|<b><font color=indigo>Qura 'Morhek</font></b>]] [[w:c:halofanon:user:Specops306|<u><i><font color=blue><sup>The Autocrat</sup></font></i></u>]] [[User talk:Specops306|<u><i><font color=purple><sup>of Morheka</sup></font></i></u>]] 18:07, 26 August 2017 (EDT) | ||
#{{Support}} - Yeah I agree.[[User:Sith Venator|<span style="color:green">Sith Venator</span>]] [[File:Mega Blastoise.gif|20px]] ([[User talk:Sith Venator|<span style="color:blue">Dank Memes</span>]]) 01:28, 27 August 2017 (EDT) | #{{Support}} - Yeah I agree.[[User:Sith Venator|<span style="color:green">Sith Venator</span>]] [[File:Mega Blastoise.gif|20px]] ([[User talk:Sith Venator|<span style="color:blue">Dank Memes</span>]]) 01:28, 27 August 2017 (EDT) | ||
#{{Support}} - --[[User:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">'''NightHammer'''</span>]]''<sup>[[User talk:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(talk)</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(contribs)</span>]]</sup>'' 20:01, 4 September 2017 (EDT) | |||
===Neutral (0/0) Sysop=== | ===Neutral (0/0) Sysop=== |
Revision as of 20:01, September 4, 2017
Forums: Index → Community Proposal → Removal of the Rollbacker usergroup? |
Proposal
I am here to propose the removal of the Rollbacker usergroup.
Subtanks old proposal(as I agree with it)
There has been a proposal to remove this usergroup (and rank) and maintain only the Administration Team and the Patrollers. Honestly, I don't see much need for such usergroup since it's just skipping that one extra step to undo a revision to a page. I do not think the removal of such group would create any significant impact on its members as most of the them are inactive. — subtank 14:30, 11 July 2017 (EDT)
What I am suggesting
- Votes will be used to say yes or no to removing the Rollbacker usergroup.
- If the vote goes to the Usergroup being removed, internally Admins will discuss in a case by case scenario what to do with the existing Rollbackers what to do with them if they are active.
Votes
Please vote here!
Support (4/3) Sysop
Please use "# Support -" if you support this
- Support — Of course I support this as I submitted it. -CIA391 (talk) 17:33, 26 August 2017 (EDT)
- Support - Rollback as it currently stands is redundant.--Spartacus Talk • Contribs 17:36, 26 August 2017 (EDT)
- Support - -- Qura 'Morhek The Autocrat of Morheka 18:07, 26 August 2017 (EDT)
- Support - Yeah I agree.Sith Venator (Dank Memes) 01:28, 27 August 2017 (EDT)
- Support - --NightHammer(talk)(contribs) 20:01, 4 September 2017 (EDT)
Neutral (0/0) Sysop
Please use "# Neutral -" if you are neutral to this
Against (0/0) Sysop
Please use "# Oppose -" if you are opposed to this
Comments
Please comment here.-CIA391 (talk) 17:33, 26 August 2017 (EDT)