Talk:Energy sword (fiction): Difference between revisions

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

(→‎A few quick things: new section)
Line 259: Line 259:


::It is not possible, by physics and canonical standards the second the sword touches the ground it would burn the area around it, there is no way it can still stay ignited and not burn the area around it. Like Xeno said it is done for visual identification in the games, the games themselves dumb down the seriousness of all of the weapons for gameplay sake. [[User talk:Durandal-217|Durandal-217]] 22:32, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
::It is not possible, by physics and canonical standards the second the sword touches the ground it would burn the area around it, there is no way it can still stay ignited and not burn the area around it. Like Xeno said it is done for visual identification in the games, the games themselves dumb down the seriousness of all of the weapons for gameplay sake. [[User talk:Durandal-217|Durandal-217]] 22:32, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
== A few quick things ==
*First of all, I believe the reason that the Jump-Lunge is more effective is because you are lunging at your opponent's '''face'''.
*Second, in the Halo 2 instruction manual, it said they were thought to be only a ceremonial weapon at first. The Fist of Rukt was a ceremonial hammer and the very first Gravity Hammer, so doesn't that make it likely that the very first energy sword was more primitive and was mostly for ceremonial use? --[[User:XSuperGamer|<span style="color:#FFD700">'''''X'''''</span><span style="color:#FF7518">'''''Super'''''</span><span style="color:#CE0000">'''''Gamer'''''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:XSuperGamer|<span style="color:#303030">'''''Talk'''''</span>]]</sup> 19:10, 13 August 2011 (EDT)