Talk:Raid on High Charity: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 14:34, August 12, 2017

Title Change[edit]

I think the title of this would be better called "Raid to High Charity" since its not like much of a battle....-- The State^{(Our Decrees and Law)}^{(The State Alchemists we've enlisted)}File:ROY!.jpg|25px]] 11:56, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

I agree. Since MC and the Arbiter were the only UNSC combatants, and there was no Covenant its not really a battle. Chamboozer 22:04, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Cortana Quote isn't right, and its wasn't a mini halo it was an actual full blown installation. ProphetofTruth 19:10, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Next Battle[edit]

Does anyone else think that the Battle/Raid of Installation 04 (II) warrants its own article? It was only the crushing blow for the forces of Installation 05's Gravemind's Flood, the guillotine for the surviving Covenant Loyalists at the Ark, the deathplace of Johnson and Spark, the cause of extreme damage,if not the destruction, of the Ark, and the catalyst for the loss of John. If anyone agrees, please express your thoughts. I feel that it would make a great article.

-Braidenvl @ 8:23 P.M. 5/3/08

This page should be renamed. Arby116

Same about their being a Raid/Battle of Installation 04(II)[edit]

I agree on their being a battle of installation o4 (B) article yeah, I click Raid on Installation 04(B) and it only shows up as Installation 04(B). Pretty annoying.

So who else believes raid of installation 04 warrants its own article? Anyone? --CookieMonstersayshello 14:17, 2 August 2011 (EDT)

Good question.--ハローファン (H1234-NET) 14:21, 2 August 2011 (EDT)

I personally think if raid on high charity can have its own article why cant raid on installation 04b have its own article? --CookieMonstersayshello 14:37, 2 August 2011 (EDT)

Needed[edit]

Is this page really needed? There at most maybe four participants and overall it's hardly a major engagement. Tuckerscreator^(stalk) 19:08, 8 February 2011 (EST)

Yes it is John had to go in there to get Cortana and fight off numerous Flood forces If you count the flood and all there forces there are way more than four participants #@lof@n1234 20:48, 8 February 2011 (EST)

Yes, but we got rid of the Battle at Sword Base even though that was directly the UNSC vs the Covenant simply because it is not notable enough. Neither is this.Tuckerscreator^(stalk) 18:12, 10 February 2011 (EST)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==Title Change==
-I think the title of this would be better called "Raid to High Charity" since its not like much of a battle....--[[user:SPARTAN-077| The State]]<sup>([[user talk:SPARTAN-077|Our Decrees and Law]])</sup><sup>([[Special:Contributions/SPARTAN-077|The State Alchemists we've enlisted]])</sup>[[Image:ROY!.jpg|25px]] 11:56, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
+I think the title of this would be better called "Raid to High Charity" since its not like much of a battle....--[[user:SPARTAN-077| The State]]<sup>([[user talk:SPARTAN-077|Our Decrees and Law]])</sup><sup>([[Special:Contributions/SPARTAN-077|The State Alchemists we've enlisted]])</sup>File:ROY!.jpg|25px]] 11:56, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 I agree. Since MC and the Arbiter were the only UNSC combatants, and there was no Covenant its not really a battle. [[User:Chamboozer|Chamboozer]] 22:04, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 Cortana Quote isn't right, and its wasn't a mini halo it was an actual full blown installation. [[User:ProphetofTruth|ProphetofTruth]] 19:10, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
+== Next Battle ==
+Does anyone else think that the Battle/Raid of Installation 04 (II) warrants its own article? It was only ''the'' crushing blow for the forces of Installation 05's Gravemind's Flood, the guillotine for the surviving Covenant Loyalists at the Ark, the deathplace of Johnson and Spark, the cause of extreme damage,if not the ''destruction'', of the Ark, and the catalyst for the loss of John. If anyone agrees, please express your thoughts. I feel that it would make a great article.
+-'''Braidenvl @ 8:23 P.M. 5/3/08'''
+This page should be renamed. Arby116
+== Same about their being a Raid/Battle of Installation 04(II) ==
+I agree on their being a battle of installation o4 (B) article yeah, I click Raid on Installation 04(B) and it only shows up as Installation 04(B). Pretty annoying.
+So who else believes raid of installation 04 warrants its own article? Anyone? --[[User talk:CookieMonstersayshello|CookieMonstersayshello]] 14:17, 2 August 2011 (EDT)
+:Good question.--[[User:Halofan1234|ハローファン]] ([[User talk:Halofan1234|H1234-NET]]) 14:21, 2 August 2011 (EDT)
+I personally think if raid on high charity can have its own article why cant raid on installation 04b have its own article? --[[User talk:CookieMonstersayshello|CookieMonstersayshello]] 14:37, 2 August 2011 (EDT)
+==Needed==
+Is this page really needed? There at most maybe four participants and overall it's hardly a major engagement. [[User:Tuckerscreator|<span style="color:#6600cc;">'''''Tuckerscreator'''''</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Tuckerscreator|<font color="#008000">stalk</font>]])</sup> 19:08, 8 February 2011 (EST)
+:Yes it is John had to go in there to get Cortana and fight off numerous Flood forces If you count the flood and all there forces  there are way more than four participants [[#@lof@n1234]] 20:48, 8 February 2011 (EST)
+Yes, but we got rid of the Battle at Sword Base even though that was directly the UNSC vs the Covenant simply because it is not notable enough. Neither is this.[[User:Tuckerscreator|<span style="color:#6600cc;">'''''Tuckerscreator'''''</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Tuckerscreator|<font color="#008000">stalk</font>]])</sup> 18:12, 10 February 2011 (EST)