Talk:Dextro Xur-pattern Spirit

Grunts getting out of a Spirit

Technical Issues?

Are you sure it was gotten rid of due to technical issues? I mean if thats the case then why didn't they just fix it? —This unsigned comment was made by 87.254.65.193 (talk • contribs). Please sign your posts with ~~~~

Yeah, that looks like speculation. I've removed it. --Dragonclaws 02:41, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Well it's Bull that we <users> are not able to use it it is Shit!

Spirt Dropship

I want to know what the proper name of it is. —This unsigned comment was made by Joshua 029 (talk • contribs). Please sign your posts with ~~~~

As far as I know, it hasn't been revealed. --Dragonclaws 19:24, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Apparently it just has: See this post. Despite the bungie.org address, KP is in fact a Bungie employee. --Andrew Nagy 68.44.13.236 19:55, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

• Looking through the thread I see that:

• Harbinger is the unofficial fan name of it althought Apparation is used too
• Apparantly on Pg 195 of Ghosts of Onyx, it is mentioned, once or twice with the Phantoms. I just finished the book and that is only reference to that name I've ever seen. "-Phantoms, Spirits and even Banshees--[1]" (195).
• When Peptuck from the forum says, "I would make the call that the U-shaped dropships are actually "Spirit" transports"[2]. KP or Kevin Paul seems to confirm the name by stating, "Yeah, it's the U-shaped dropship from Halo 1.- KP"

• So should this article be moved to "Spirt Covenant Dropship"? -- Esemono 22:35, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

I would move it to "Spirit". If we move it to "Covenant Dropship", we will need to adjust the title of every vehicle for consistancy, and I think the pages should just be the real name. --Dragonclaws 22:55, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

This is the only place I'v seen it being called Spirit so someone should change it back to dropship.--prophit of war 21:59, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Bungie confirms. --Dragonclaws 23:45, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

I heard a marine call it a "Bandit" in the level "Halo".--User:JohnSpartan117 [3] 23:09, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

The term "Bandit" usually means enemy, he wasn't calling the dropship by a name, he was just pointing out that there were enemies around. User:Joshua 029

Bandit and Bogie are common names for enemy aircraft.

I wish it was usable in Halo 3. User:superplayer08

DX-class Dropship

Where did this name come from? --Dragonclaws^(talk) 00:54, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Halo: Ghosts of Onyx, page 286.

"Something..." Y'gar leaned closer to examine the wavering reply signal.

Voro Moved to his station.

"It's one of ours." Voro declared. "Send it to the ship's Oracle for pattern match."

"Yes, sir." Y'gar replied. "Ship ID . . . DX Class."

"A Dropship? Identify the parent ship registry."

Yeah... Eric Nylund appears to get the rights to name things. It may or may not ever be in a game, but since Y'gar said it's a DX Class and Voro knew it was a Dropship, DX must mean Dropship, or Spirit. --68.160.110.166 03:12, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

I think it means Dragonclaws Is A UF

Maybe everyone who looks at it gets a sad face. Dreaddraco2 21:20, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Logistics

There are between the fork appears perfect for ferrying large numbers of covenant supply cases that would be clumsy in a Phantom. The spirit looks perfect for a logistical support aircraft possessing only light armor and armament. On the first Halo, they might have been repurposed as combat dropships. A lack of phantoms available to the covenant on Halo would support the theory. If, at the battle of Reach, all or most of the phantoms were already ferrying troops to the planet and those ships that pursued the Pillar of Autumn left without their phantoms. Then only a handful or reduced number of phantoms would be with the fleet and be used only sparingly for important assignments such as Rtas Vadumee's retaking of the Infinite Succor. Thus, the logistical/non-combatant dropships would be used to fill the role.

Maybe, but that's still speculationToen6 21:01, July 26, 2010 (UTC)

Inaccurate Information?

"Within each of these bays there appears to be a door hinting at the possibility that more soldiers could be unleashed from deeper within the vessel."

I've had the opportunity to inspect Halo: Combat Evolved's Spirit dropship thoroughly, and not once have I seen such a door as referenced here. There are open, darkened passageways on the sternmost ends of each bay, but these, according to Halo works, simply lead to the cockpit, not another personnel compartment.

Should this statement be removed/changed?

Moxus 12:53, 28 June 2009 (UTC)Moxus

Actually we don't have enough info about this, also because Halo CE's Spirit was not very detailedin its depiction, so let's keep that statement. User:Spirit of Fire/Sig 13:00, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

OK im confused. Does it unload troops through it's drop-bay doors or a grav-lift and if it uses a grav-lift where does the turret go?--4.153.69.250 23:33, November 28, 2009 (UTC)Lance Corporal Phy-ODST

It unload troops through its drop-bay doors. The grav-lift, to my understanding, is for quick pick-up as seen in Halo Wars' cutscene. In the cutscene, it seems the Turret Ball goes into the craft, thus allowing the dropship to use its grav-lift.- 5əb'7aŋk^(7alk) 23:34, November 28, 2009 (UTC)

Thanks I appreciate the info--4.153.69.250 23:39, November 28, 2009 (UTC)Lance Corporal Phy-ODST

Change the picture?

Sould'nt we change the picture to a better detailed one, like from Halo Wars?--Yugiohtipman34 06:24, November 21, 2009 (UTC)

You can't really make detailed images of Halo Wars because the graphics are not as good as the first-person shooter games. Rezo 'Scratoqee (Talk) 20:17, June 10, 2010 (UTC)

Type-25 Troop Carrier

I'm probably not the first to see this, but this page from bungie.net says it's official name is Typer-25 Troop Carrier, so should the title be changed or what? Field Master Spartansniper450 00:45, January 29, 2010 (UTC)

in th Halo Reach manuel, it's known as the Type-28 troop carrier.--For the Swarm! 19:03, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Then the article should be changed. The wraith is listed with a diffrent number also, so that nneds to be changed too. Jabberwockxeno 11:19, 14 November 2010 (EST)

7?

Does anyone else find it interesting that the Type-25 and the Type-52 both have 2 and 5 in their designations? Which add up to 7? 138.88.76.77 21:26, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

Good find, that is interestingBlahmarrow 23:47, September 19, 2010 (UTC)

Driveable?

Is this able to be driven in Reach? I really hope so as I think that the Spirit is cool. Could any information regarding this be posted here? Thanks.

Sorry bud, it isn't. But I bet you could mod it if you wanted to.Blahmarrow 23:49, September 19, 2010 (UTC)

Spirit weapons

In the article it incorectly states the auto cannon used by the spirit and Phantom is the Light Plasma Mortar. This is incorrect becuse having played the game, there are numerus differences in how the two cannons perform mainly the lack of the mortar head color differences and the lack of an arc on the Plasma. I belive that that was most likely prerelese speculation and should be taken out.Dragrath1 19:37, September 25, 2010 (UTC)

Destructable?

Anyone know if the Reach version can be destroyed or if it is invincible like the CE version? VARGR 21:32, September 27, 2010 (UTC)

Designation Change to Type-25

I was actually really surprised how this makes complete sense. Stephen Loftus seems to have confirmed it from his experience collaborating with 343, though as a fan I'm not sure what his opinion is worth. -- Specops306 ^{Autocrat Qur'a 'Morhek} 06:26, 1 August 2011 (EDT)

Page 184 of The Essential Visual Guide confirms that the Spectre was first encountered in 2546, and Waypoint says that the space Banshee was first encountered in 2527. We know that the plasma pistol, the Spiker, the Chopper, and likely the Brute Shot were first encountered at Harvest in 2525. The "Enemies" section of the Halo: Reach website states that the Sangheili were deployed against humanity immediately after the First Battle of Harvest, which makes it likely that the plasma rifle was first seen at that time.

The problem is that several weapons and vehicles were first encountered years earlier than their designations may suggest. For example, the T-33 LAAW was first encountered in 2531, as stated both here and in The Essential Visual Guide. The Ghost, the Needler, the beam rifle, the Scarab, and the Locust - which isn't mentioned in that article - were all first encountered before 2531. The Type-52 DESW was encountered as early as 2544. Taking every designation at face value suggests that the Covenant didn't deploy key pieces of their arsenal until years into the war, though the EVG clearly states that the designs of some of these assets were thousands of years old. Unsurprisingly, some of the guys on HBO have tried to throw around "halo wars isnt canon cuz it wasnt made by bungie lol" and "they didnt hav teh story bible" nonsense, but they have no solid ground to stand on. --Courage never dies. 11:07, 1 August 2011 (EDT)