Talk:Elefen-pattern battlecruiser: Difference between revisions

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

No edit summary
m (Text replacement - "{{UnsignedZervziel}}" to "{{Unsigned|Zervziel}}")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==Page split==
==Page split==
Is there is no known distinction between Ket and Elefen pattern battlecruisers, it's not really wise to split the CCS pages{{UnsignedZervziel}}
Is there is no known distinction between Ket and Elefen pattern battlecruisers, it's not really wise to split the CCS pages{{Unsigned|Zervziel}}
:They are two completely different classes of ship - this alone makes them noteworthy for splitting up. An absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.[[User:BaconShelf|<span style="color:green;">BaconShelf</span>]] <span style="font-size:90%">([[User:BaconShelf|talk]])</span> 04:20, November 29, 2022 (EST)
:They are two completely different classes of ship - this alone makes them noteworthy for splitting up. An absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.[[User:BaconShelf|<span style="color:green;">BaconShelf</span>]] <span style="font-size:90%">([[User:BaconShelf|talk]])</span> 04:20, November 29, 2022 (EST)

Latest revision as of 10:41, November 29, 2022

Page split[edit]

Is there is no known distinction between Ket and Elefen pattern battlecruisers, it's not really wise to split the CCS pages—This unsigned comment was made by Zervziel (talkcontribs). Please sign your posts with ~~~~

They are two completely different classes of ship - this alone makes them noteworthy for splitting up. An absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.BaconShelf (talk) 04:20, November 29, 2022 (EST)