Talk:Elefen-pattern battlecruiser: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
BaconShelf (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "{{UnsignedZervziel}}" to "{{Unsigned|Zervziel}}") |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Page split== | ==Page split== | ||
Is there is no known distinction between Ket and Elefen pattern battlecruisers, it's not really wise to split the CCS pages{{ | Is there is no known distinction between Ket and Elefen pattern battlecruisers, it's not really wise to split the CCS pages{{Unsigned|Zervziel}} | ||
:They are two completely different classes of ship - this alone makes them noteworthy for splitting up. An absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.[[User:BaconShelf|<span style="color:green;">BaconShelf</span>]] <span style="font-size:90%">([[User:BaconShelf|talk]])</span> 04:20, November 29, 2022 (EST) | :They are two completely different classes of ship - this alone makes them noteworthy for splitting up. An absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.[[User:BaconShelf|<span style="color:green;">BaconShelf</span>]] <span style="font-size:90%">([[User:BaconShelf|talk]])</span> 04:20, November 29, 2022 (EST) |
Latest revision as of 10:41, November 29, 2022
Page split[edit]
Is there is no known distinction between Ket and Elefen pattern battlecruisers, it's not really wise to split the CCS pages—This unsigned comment was made by Zervziel (talk • contribs). Please sign your posts with ~~~~
- They are two completely different classes of ship - this alone makes them noteworthy for splitting up. An absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.BaconShelf (talk) 04:20, November 29, 2022 (EST)