Talk:FFG-045: Difference between revisions

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
Where exactly does this FFG-045 come from? I would like to doubt that a hull registry would have a leading 0 since we've seen 2-digit hull numbers in the past without them. Can this entry have better attribution than just 'Halo 4'?
Where exactly does this FFG-045 come from? I would like to doubt that a hull registry would have a leading 0 since we've seen 2-digit hull numbers in the past without them. Can this entry have better attribution than just 'Halo 4'?
:Well apparently it's just mentioned in the Armory, here's where it is : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZD1TluC-0s (skip to 6:29), not sure if there is anything much about this frigate.[[User:Imrane-117|Imrane-117]] ([[User talk:Imrane-117|talk]]) 09:24, 20 June 2013 (EDT)
:Well apparently it's just mentioned in the Armory, here's where it is : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZD1TluC-0s (skip to 6:29), not sure if there is anything much about this frigate.[[User:Imrane-117|Imrane-117]] ([[User talk:Imrane-117|talk]]) 09:24, 20 June 2013 (EDT)
::So despite the source indicating a the armor is tested in a combat lab, this is assumed to be a frigate and not a coincidental use of FFG which could have some other meaning? Seems its 'canonicity' could use some verification... [[User:ScaleMaster117|ScaleMaster117]] ([[User talk:ScaleMaster117|talk]]) 09:36, 20 June 2013 (EDT)

Revision as of 09:36, June 20, 2013

Source?

Where exactly does this FFG-045 come from? I would like to doubt that a hull registry would have a leading 0 since we've seen 2-digit hull numbers in the past without them. Can this entry have better attribution than just 'Halo 4'?

Well apparently it's just mentioned in the Armory, here's where it is : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZD1TluC-0s (skip to 6:29), not sure if there is anything much about this frigate.Imrane-117 (talk) 09:24, 20 June 2013 (EDT)
So despite the source indicating a the armor is tested in a combat lab, this is assumed to be a frigate and not a coincidental use of FFG which could have some other meaning? Seems its 'canonicity' could use some verification... ScaleMaster117 (talk) 09:36, 20 June 2013 (EDT)