Heavensblood's board-to-board with BaconShelf

In this case, the names are a fairly major indicator, but you're not wrong.

OK! That's like saying gov Aukland and Thomas Levesque aren't "males" because there is no source that says that they are specifically "males". There are lots more like that as well. That would be a presumption as well, meaning it should be removed since we cannot definitively say that Thomas is a guy.

In this case, we cannot definitively say they were employed by Misriah as the book does not state they were working with Misriah. In this case, noting that they were likely employed by Misriah but this is not confirmed by the source material is fine. If anything, this should go the other direction (at least based off the information in the text you provided) and remove all mentions of the possibility of them working with Misriah.

Halopedia only sticks with the information established by the games media, etc. The word presumably is another word for speculative which means that it could just be a theory and not a fact. The reason why I changed the article is to provide more factual meaning behind the article. There is only one source called the halo essential visual guide which I own and has no mention to gov Aukland or Thomas Levesque being "presumably" employed by the misriah armoury which is a pretty big deal if you ask me. This is the direct quote from the source "the title GATL is an abbreviation to the crafts arecticts Gov Aukland and Thomas Levesque". It seems like the author of the book made it seem like they are employed to the company as there is no mention that they are not.

Hi, it'd be great if you could state your reasoning for removing the note from the Aukland page - that information is there to clarify a piece of information not confirmed in the given source. Unless a new source has directly overriden it, it shouldn't be removed. Thanks.