Talk:Two Spartan Lasers on Halo: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
DavidJCobb (talk | contribs) (→Rename) |
m (Typo fixing, replaced: [[Image: → File: (2)) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The way the article is currently set up, it makes it sound as though the "Two Splasers" aspect is the main glitch, with the "Infinite Charge" being a subglitch. However, it's actually the "Infinite Charge" that's the main glitch, with the "Two Splasers" aspect being a side-effect. | The way the article is currently set up, it makes it sound as though the "Two Splasers" aspect is the main glitch, with the "Infinite Charge" being a subglitch. However, it's actually the "Infinite Charge" that's the main glitch, with the "Two Splasers" aspect being a side-effect. | ||
The second Splaser is a totally separate weapon that happens to also have infinite charge. That's the glitch. The ability to use it along with another, normal, Spartan Laser is merely a side-effect. The article should be renamed to reflect this; the previous name of "Spartan Laser Glitch" should work. <span style="background:#AADDAA;display:inline-block;height:16px;padding-right:4px;line-height:1em;position:relative;top:-3px;-moz-border-radius:0 50% 50%"><b> | The second Splaser is a totally separate weapon that happens to also have infinite charge. That's the glitch. The ability to use it along with another, normal, Spartan Laser is merely a side-effect. The article should be renamed to reflect this; the previous name of "Spartan Laser Glitch" should work. <span style="background:#AADDAA;display:inline-block;height:16px;padding-right:4px;line-height:1em;position:relative;top:-3px;-moz-border-radius:0 50% 50%"><b>File:DavidJCobb_Emblem.svg|16px]] [[User:DavidJCobb|<span style="color:#000;position:relative;top:.15em">DavidJCobb </span>]]</b></span> 18:28, 9 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
==Merge== | ==Merge== | ||
It's clearly the same glitch, it involves the same methods. You can carry two of the [[Spartan Laser]]s at once because the game considers them to be different weapons -- one of which happens to have unlimited ammo. | It's clearly the same glitch, it involves the same methods. You can carry two of the [[Spartan Laser]]s at once because the game considers them to be different weapons -- one of which happens to have unlimited ammo. | ||
If we do merge, the whole "Two Lasers At Once" aspect should probably be considered the least important aspect -- it's really just a side-effect. <span style="background:#AADDAA;display:inline-block;height:16px;padding-right:4px;line-height:1em;position:relative;top:-3px;-moz-border-radius:0 50% 50%"><b> | If we do merge, the whole "Two Lasers At Once" aspect should probably be considered the least important aspect -- it's really just a side-effect. <span style="background:#AADDAA;display:inline-block;height:16px;padding-right:4px;line-height:1em;position:relative;top:-3px;-moz-border-radius:0 50% 50%"><b>File:DavidJCobb_Emblem.png|16px]] [[User:DavidJCobb|<span style="color:#000;position:relative;top:.15em">DavidJCobb </span>]]</b></span> 23:04, 16 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:08, August 10, 2017
Rename[edit]
The way the article is currently set up, it makes it sound as though the "Two Splasers" aspect is the main glitch, with the "Infinite Charge" being a subglitch. However, it's actually the "Infinite Charge" that's the main glitch, with the "Two Splasers" aspect being a side-effect.
The second Splaser is a totally separate weapon that happens to also have infinite charge. That's the glitch. The ability to use it along with another, normal, Spartan Laser is merely a side-effect. The article should be renamed to reflect this; the previous name of "Spartan Laser Glitch" should work. File:DavidJCobb_Emblem.svg|16px]] DavidJCobb 18:28, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Merge[edit]
It's clearly the same glitch, it involves the same methods. You can carry two of the Spartan Lasers at once because the game considers them to be different weapons -- one of which happens to have unlimited ammo.
If we do merge, the whole "Two Lasers At Once" aspect should probably be considered the least important aspect -- it's really just a side-effect. File:DavidJCobb_Emblem.png|16px]] DavidJCobb 23:04, 16 June 2009 (UTC)