Talk:14.5×114mm: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
(→Delete) |
(→HVAP) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Well, WWII used up a lot of different kinds of rounds, so this isn't really surprising. --[[User:Blemo|<font color="SteelBlue">Bl</font>]][[User talk:Blemo|<font color="royalblue">em</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Blemo|<font color=gray>o</font>]]<sup>[http://www.bungie.net/Stats/Halo3/Default.aspx?player=Blemo+23 <font color=Teal>23</font>]</sup> 04:26, 23 November 2007 (UTC) | Well, WWII used up a lot of different kinds of rounds, so this isn't really surprising. --[[User:Blemo|<font color="SteelBlue">Bl</font>]][[User talk:Blemo|<font color="royalblue">em</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Blemo|<font color=gray>o</font>]]<sup>[http://www.bungie.net/Stats/Halo3/Default.aspx?player=Blemo+23 <font color=Teal>23</font>]</sup> 04:26, 23 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
==Delete== | ==Delete== | ||
'''Delete''' - The WWII round was not fin stabilized nor did it use discarding sabots.--[[User:EliteSpartan|'''<font color="Green">EliteSpartan</font>''' | '''Delete''' - The WWII round was not fin stabilized nor did it use discarding sabots.--[[User:EliteSpartan|'''<font color="Green">EliteSpartan</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:EliteSpartan|'''<font color="Black">My Talk</font>''']]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/EliteSpartan|'''<font color="Black">My Contribs</font>''']]</sub> 04:45, 23 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
Hes right. Trust me, I know. get rid of it. [[User:Spartan 107|Spartan 107]] 06:13, 1 December 2007 (UTC) | Hes right. Trust me, I know. get rid of it. [[User:Spartan 107|Spartan 107]] 06:13, 1 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
::Adttionally, the comment that it does not preform well as a anti-material round is no longer true as of halo reach. I'm going to adjust the artcile on both regards. [[Special:Contributions/69.132.69.87|69.132.69.87]] | ::Adttionally, the comment that it does not preform well as a anti-material round is no longer true as of halo reach. I'm going to adjust the artcile on both regards. [[Special:Contributions/69.132.69.87|69.132.69.87]] | ||
== HVAP == | |||
No such thing as HVAP, Jun is just stating facts about the projectile (High-velocity, and armor piercing). Presumably the ammo in nightfall is the same "standard" saboted round. Sabot rounds specificaly exist to be higher velocity and armor penetrating comparted to ball rounds of the same caliber, ergo the idea of an HVAP round is nonsensical. 11:58, July 3, 2020 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 11:58, July 3, 2020
Well, WWII used up a lot of different kinds of rounds, so this isn't really surprising. --Blemo23 04:26, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete[edit]
Delete - The WWII round was not fin stabilized nor did it use discarding sabots.--EliteSpartan My TalkMy Contribs 04:45, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Hes right. Trust me, I know. get rid of it. Spartan 107 06:13, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- Adttionally, the comment that it does not preform well as a anti-material round is no longer true as of halo reach. I'm going to adjust the artcile on both regards. 69.132.69.87
HVAP[edit]
No such thing as HVAP, Jun is just stating facts about the projectile (High-velocity, and armor piercing). Presumably the ammo in nightfall is the same "standard" saboted round. Sabot rounds specificaly exist to be higher velocity and armor penetrating comparted to ball rounds of the same caliber, ergo the idea of an HVAP round is nonsensical. 11:58, July 3, 2020 (EDT)