From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
Hey I have a quick question, I’m working on a new gallery in a page, am I supposed to put it in chronological or release date order
Thanks for the tips, I just have no access to any social media (i.e. YouTube, discord) rn due to a break but I’ll be sure to do so in the future
Ehm, ok...but realistically I don't think that in lore there is something that would prevent Spartan to use a OSTEO helmet on a Mark VII armor, or a Veles helmet on a Rakshasa armor, etc...
Sorry, but why keeping that list of variants in those pages when they are all listed in the GEN3 page now ? To me it doesn't make sense. I this point, core-belonging doesn't mean much.
A question about the GEN3 Viper. Is not visible but it was already seen by the public. Can I upload it ?
Understood. I'll be more careful and be sure that is only visible content.
Thank you for the tips, I’ll do better in the future. I used to edit a lot on an old account a long time ago but I lost the login info and really got out of practice. Much be love mate
Oh I’d like to apologize as well for the Rosenda page edit, I mistook the word “loadout” for the word “kit”, that’s my bad on that part
Howdy, I was just creating links to make it easier to navigate within the site, I did notice that “Battle of the Apex” was not the correct term and was in the midst of deleting it. Thank you
Perfect, sounds good.
I just noticed your edit and referred back to the encyclopedia, and I see now that it indeed says 2x magnification, so I agree that part of my edit was in error. Perhaps it would be best to leave the "Design Details" section with 2x magnification and change the "In-Game Information" section to state 2.5x? I have noticed a lot of confusion with people wanting to know what the BR75's magnification is in-game (some think 2x, some 2.5x, and some 3x), and I would like to clarify this somewhere on the page. Maybe a sentence clarifying this discrepancy would be in order. Let me know your thoughts. <-<->->
I just noticed your edit and referred back to the encyclopedia, and I see now that it indeed says 2x magnification, so I agree that part of my edit was in error. Perhaps it would be best to leave the "Design Details" section with 2x magnification and change the "In-Game Information" section to state 2.5x? I have noticed a lot of confusion with people wanting to know what the BR75's magnification is in-game (some think 2x, some 2.5x, and some 3x), and I would like to clarify this somewhere on the page. Maybe a sentence clarifying this discrepancy would be in order. Let me know your thoughts. <-<->->
Hi there, my apologies for uploading images that were photoshopped. I wasn't sure that would apply to unofficial edits, granted I didn't specifically state that in the description. Given Alex Wakeford's comical edits of the Outcast art, I would have guessed that was acceptable. My hope was to share/make these images available for anyone who might not be edit-savvy enough to edit out text bubbles or isolate a character in an artwork. Is there a way that this kind of asset can still be available for people who might want it here on the Halopedia site? If not that's totally fine! I've just always found that the site is a great resource for finding images for content creation.
Turns out I should pay more attention to citation instructions. Sorry!
And about that sleep thing, I left the edit page open on a revision made before yours. What happens to the article if I save it?
OH, sorry about that. I was going to remake the image in 1920x1080 in Halo 3 but I fell asleep before doing so. I try to not orphan older images by replacing or moving.
Hey, is it just me, or does it seem like the Halo writers recently are concluding the stories of the major enemies that have been built up over the years in favor of focusing solely on the Created and the Banished as the main bad guys of the series now??? I mean first there was Jul 'Mdama. To be fair, I never understood why they created him in the first place since Jul was created at a time when there were no plans to make future games. Then, most recently, Intrepid Eye was FINALLY destroyed, and the Keepers of the One Freedom have been effectively neutralized as a threat, including Castor. Now Nizat is finally dead too, although we still don't know what the hell happened to his plot to destroy ONI. I mean it obviously failed, but a mention of what happened would've been nice. And then the upcoming book is supposed to wrap up the Didact's story too.
How should we cite the war that raged on Netherop for 33 years between Nizat's forces and Petrov's??? I mean what should we call that event??? And the mission that occurred in Outcasts too since that was a bit of a battle in its own right.
I know, but with Nizat that was more of a broad overview of what we learned of the events of those 33 years throughout the whole novel rather than it being in one place that's easy to pin down.
Sith Venerator told me that it was fine.
Hey what time tomorrow are we going to be allowed to start changing the Halo Outcast page and the pages related to it???
I will not revert or challenge an edit of an Administrator/Moderator but, man, I must tell you, with all respect, that I think you are wrong about it. Proxy never called Athos a member of the Assembly, he simple considered members of the Created Minority all AIs that didn't join Cortana. Besides, 343 themselves confirmed that the Created and the Assembly are two different things and that Sloan had only take inspiration from the second, integrating its political structure into the Created. The article also mention the differences between the Assembly Minority, which was in favor of a more direct approach and policy, and the Created Minority, which is the opposite, and want a more moderate policy. Which is exactly what Athos said. It wouldn't make sense for him being a member of the Assembly Minority, because his opinion is the opposite of theirs. Athos is a member of the Created Minority and that's all. He was never a member of the Assembly. I don't understand why we are even talking about it. It's so obvious. Like I said, I will not change your edit because I don't want any conflict with the wiki's staff but I think keeping Athos as a member of the Assembly is a huge mistake that contradict all sources.
Everything I did today was sourced or obvious. I sourced the 2557 one and adding the lookout to the swords of sangheilios ships list is literally a fact considering the has a joint crew of swords personnel and human personnel. Unless I made an edit aside from those today that I’m forgetting I would appreciate clarification on what I’ve done wrong.