Talk:Forerunner-Flood war: Difference between revisions

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

(I added more)
Line 8: Line 8:


I came in here to see what was being disputed...and poof.  Nothing. What the heck? [[User:Itsgms|Itsgms]] 06:35, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
I came in here to see what was being disputed...and poof.  Nothing. What the heck? [[User:Itsgms|Itsgms]] 06:35, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
How do we know that the Flood entered the Milky Way Galaxy in 98,379 BCE?  That is only when they were discovered on G617g.  The Flood could have been lying dormant on that planet for thousands of years.


== I added more ==
== I added more ==


commanders --KDP3 22:18, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
commanders --KDP3 22:18, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:44, June 27, 2008

Outcome of the war

Technically isn't it a self-induced Forerunner defeat, as the Forerunners annihilated themselves by firing the Halo rings while leaving the Flood alive.

You do know we're Forerunner right? And also, in Contact Harvest, after Mercident Bias(Or however you spell it)tells the Prophets at the Dreadnought that he has watched them misinterpret it for years, and he states that their symbol for "reclaimation" was actually upside down, and stood for "reclaimer", and therefore Harvest was full of them. Bllasae

So why is the talk page blank?

I came in here to see what was being disputed...and poof. Nothing. What the heck? Itsgms 06:35, 26 January 2008 (UTC)


How do we know that the Flood entered the Milky Way Galaxy in 98,379 BCE? That is only when they were discovered on G617g. The Flood could have been lying dormant on that planet for thousands of years.

I added more

commanders --KDP3 22:18, 5 May 2008 (UTC)