Talk:Shaw-Fujikawa Translight Engine: Difference between revisions

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

Line 27: Line 27:


:Yep, my intent is to split the page so we have an article named either "slipspace drive" or perhaps the more formal "translight engine", and then have an article for the SFTE engine. --[[User:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">'''NightHammer'''</span>]]''<sup>[[User talk:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(talk)</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(contribs)</span>]]</sup>'' 20:49, 9 January 2018 (EST)
:Yep, my intent is to split the page so we have an article named either "slipspace drive" or perhaps the more formal "translight engine", and then have an article for the SFTE engine. --[[User:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">'''NightHammer'''</span>]]''<sup>[[User talk:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(talk)</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(contribs)</span>]]</sup>'' 20:49, 9 January 2018 (EST)
::I honestly don't know if it's even necessary to have a separate article for the SFTE if we go with "slipspace drive" for the umbrella page. Granted, there are a bit more specifics available on the human drives, but the general idea is still the same. The articles actually used to be split way back, but they were merged for that very reason - there really wasn't enough distinguishing info to justify keeping them separate. It's true, though, that "slipspace drive" or "translight engine" would be a better title for the general article. Technically, one could argue that any slipspace drive could be considered to qualify as an "SFTE" insofar as one might formally call slipspace "Shaw-Fujikawa space", but it's not really a strong justification. --[[User:Jugus|Jugus]] ([[User talk:Jugus|talk]]) 02:59, 12 January 2018 (EST)