Talk:NOVA bomb: Difference between revisions

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

No edit summary
(One powerful bomb here.)
Line 31: Line 31:


Well the NOVA bomb does what it names implies it supposedly does what a star does in a nova or a supernova totally incinerating the entire planet to the extent of wiping it away. [[User:SPARTAN-089|SPARTAN-089]] 19:26, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Well the NOVA bomb does what it names implies it supposedly does what a star does in a nova or a supernova totally incinerating the entire planet to the extent of wiping it away. [[User:SPARTAN-089|SPARTAN-089]] 19:26, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
== One powerful bomb here. ==
This is a really powerful bomb. I wouldn't want anything like that anywhere near earth.

Revision as of 22:46, March 4, 2008

Template:FOF-2 Damn that's powerful. Hooah. (152.65.64.27 01:15, 8 December 2006 (UTC))


Shouldn't someone do the math? y my off the top of my head calculations, its peak output should be somthing like27 gigatons, 9x30 megaton warheadsx100 = 2187000000 ton or 2187megaton or 22gigaton aproximatly File:ODST1 u.jpgChief frank 001Bla Bla BlaWhat I've doneFile:Marines HALO wars.jpg 13:25, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

2 Articles

  • Merge Just merge it, and good god i want one of those 68.224.54.43 01:25, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Why are there 2 articles on the NOVA bomb? 204.6.91.236 19:52, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
    • Because someone made a mistake. --Dragonclaws(talk) 21:32, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge put this information on the page about the NOVA bomb as that is the NOVA's full name - Ares.117 11:23, 3 Feburary 2007
  • Merge-User: Spartan 1138 23:23, 5 Feburary 2007
  • Agreeing with the Merge TheObviousOne 23:13, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
  • MERGE--SPARTAN-137 17:54, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

  • MERGE There is no need for 2. There can only be.. ONE!! --Pvt. Vamis Vinam 01:04, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
  • MERGE-James-001 19:43, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
  • MERgE "There isn't a [wiki] big enough for two [Nova]s!" Mad MacAdder, who is madder than Mad Jack McMad, the winner of last year's "Mr. Madman" competition. With some words replaced to make it appropriate for the present situation. guesty-persony-thingyI too am an AI... my owner's name is Supreme Honcho. 19:52, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge-There's no need to have two articles on the same topic.-Raptor117 01:24, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Merged.R1e2u3b4e5n6 08:37, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Another planet killer

Well...let's see..you need about 10E32 joules to blow planet apart. We have nine warheads. If we assume them to be 100 megaton each (thats powerful for a thermonucear charge), and that due to the construction of the bomb the yield increases hundrefold, and than do some maths. 9x100 megaton x 100= 90 000 megaton = 90 gigaton in TNT quivalent Hiroshima explosion (15 kilotonn) was about 63 terajoules (6,3x10E13 joules) powerful. NOVA is 6 000 000 times more powerful, so we have 138 000 000 terajoules power, or 1,38x10E20 joules. Burn a continent - possible, Exterminatus ? NO...

PS - Contact of a "dino-killer" asteroid with Earth caused 1 000 gigatonn explosion. But well - Earth is still intact...

Well the NOVA bomb does what it names implies it supposedly does what a star does in a nova or a supernova totally incinerating the entire planet to the extent of wiping it away. SPARTAN-089 19:26, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

One powerful bomb here.

This is a really powerful bomb. I wouldn't want anything like that anywhere near earth.