Talk:Halo: The Essential Visual Guide: Difference between revisions

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
:Yeah, there's no reason to have that tag anymore.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}}
:Yeah, there's no reason to have that tag anymore.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}}
::Thank you. --[[User talk:Xamikaze330|Xamikaze330]] 16:25, 7 March 2012 (EST)Xamikaze330
::Thank you. --[[User talk:Xamikaze330|Xamikaze330]] 16:25, 7 March 2012 (EST)Xamikaze330


==Errors==
==Errors==

Revision as of 13:17, February 2, 2016

New edition coming out, or is this already done?

I was just wondering, does it still need the New Content template? It seems to me all the content that ever came out is already here, unless they plan to release a revised version, which, granted, would be great, plus the addition of maybe a few new entries on some questionable items and the like, which I have yet to hear anything about, or if not, then why is the New Content template still here? Is there something else we should know about? --Xamikaze330 13:13, 7 March 2012 (EST)Xamikaze330

Yeah, there's no reason to have that tag anymore.--Spartacus TalkContribs
Thank you. --Xamikaze330 16:25, 7 March 2012 (EST)Xamikaze330

Errors

  • On page 16, it is erroneously stated that the MA5C assault rifle does not appear in Halo 3: ODST. -> Halo 3: ODST is noted in the statistics box.
  • On page 160, the Rookie should be listed with "UNSC Marine Corps" instead of "UNSC Navy", similar to his squadmates' entries. -> I don't see any mention of the UNSC Navy on his page. He is clearly listed as UNSC Marine Corps.

88.120.49.44 07:51, 2 February 2016 (EST).

It was discovered internally, but at too late a stage to make the edit. Is your copy newer than July, 2011? If so, you may have a corrected copy. The errors listed would only apply to the first edition or so I imagine. -ScaleMaster117 (talk) 12:00, 2 February 2016 (EST)