Forum:An important question about consistency formatting: Difference between revisions

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

(Created page with "{{Forumheader|Community Proposal}} <!-- Please don't remove anything above this line, and put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Forumheader|Community Proposal}}
{{Forumheader|Community Proposal}}
<!-- Please don't remove anything above this line, and put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->
<!-- Please don't remove anything above this line, and put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->
 
*consistency, I made a spelling error, please ignore it.
I see a lot of inconsistent formatting on the wiki. I'm curious as to wich format we are sticking too with these two questions.
I see a lot of inconsistent formatting on the wiki. I'm curious as to wich format we are sticking too with these two questions.
1. In battles, when we list the belligerents. Should we use point form for each faction?
1. In battles, when we list the belligerents. Should we use point form for each faction?
Line 7: Line 7:
Example
Example


{{Battle infobox
|prev=
|conc=
|next=
|image=
|conflict=
|date=
|place=
|result=
|side1=
*[[Covenant]]
*[[Flood]]
|side2=
*[[United Nations Space Command]]
*[[Swords of Sanghelios]]
|commanders1=
|commanders2=
|forces1=
|forces2=
|casual1=
]
|casual2=
}}
or should we not use point form, example
{{Battle infobox
|prev=
|conc=
|next=
|image=
|conflict=
|date=
|place=
|result=
|side1=
[[Covenant]] <br>
[[Flood]]
|side2=
[[United Nations Space Command]] <br>
[[Swords of Sanghelios]]
|commanders1=
|commanders2=
|forces1=
|forces2=
|casual1=
]
|casual2=
}}


2. In battles, when we list the belligerents. Should we show the short form of a faction, or the full name. I see UNSC being used sometimes, and United Nations Space Command being used in other times. Which one should we use?
{{Battle infobox
|prev=
|conc=
|next=
|image=
|conflict=
|date=
|place=
|result=
|side1=
*[[Covenant]]
*[[Flood]]
|side2=
*[[United Nations Space Command]]
*[[Swords of Sanghelios]]
|commanders1=
|commanders2=
|forces1=
|forces2=
|casual1=
]
|casual2=
}}
or should we not use point form, example
or should we not use point form, example
{{Battle infobox
|prev=
|conc=
|next=
|image=
|conflict=
|date=
|place=
|result=
|side1=
[[UNSC]]
|side2=
[[United Nations Space Command]]
|commanders1=
|commanders2=
|forces1=
|forces2=


|casual1=
]
|casual2=
}}


2. In battles, when we list the belligerents. Should we show the short form of a faction, or the full name. I see UNSC being used sometimes, and United Nations Space Command being used in other times. Which one should we use?::::
::::

Revision as of 05:57, August 26, 2016

Forums: Index Community Proposal An important question about consistency formatting
Forumheader-image.png
  • consistency, I made a spelling error, please ignore it.

I see a lot of inconsistent formatting on the wiki. I'm curious as to wich format we are sticking too with these two questions. 1. In battles, when we list the belligerents. Should we use point form for each faction?

Example

An important question about consistency formatting
Details
Belligerents
Casualties

]


 

or should we not use point form, example

An important question about consistency formatting
Details
Belligerents

Covenant
Flood

United Nations Space Command
Swords of Sanghelios

Casualties

]


 

2. In battles, when we list the belligerents. Should we show the short form of a faction, or the full name. I see UNSC being used sometimes, and United Nations Space Command being used in other times. Which one should we use?

An important question about consistency formatting
Details
Belligerents
Casualties

]


 

or should we not use point form, example

An important question about consistency formatting
Details
Belligerents

UNSC

United Nations Space Command

Casualties

]