Talk:M90 shotgun: Difference between revisions

Line 137:

: Yes the Marines have standerds, but even within then their are different builds, unless everyone was a clone. Second shape of the pellet does matter, due to the way in bounces withen the barrel and how it reacts with air withen the barrel. As more the barrel, a longer barrel retains the gasses longer, causeing more recoild, versis a shorter barrel, which will allow the gasses to vent faster. Also, ehat about the amount of powder and type in the shells? If the M90 shells have more powder, that will cause more recoil. [[File:80.png|20px]] '''[[User:Arabsbananas|<span style="color:Red; font-weight:bold; font-family:Tahoma Small Cap">El Ammo Bandito,</span><span style="color:Yellow; font-weight:bold; font-family:Tahoma Small Cap"> "¡Para todas sus necesidades destructivas!"</span>]]''' 20:45, April 9, 2010 (UTC)

Time for another correction list, I guess.

1. True, but this doesn't matter, because of what I have already said.

2. This still does not affect recoil directly. It can affect the velocity of the pellets, but that's already covered.

3. This does not affect recoil. Same reason as #2.

4. This does not affect recoil significantly. The powder's contribution is more momentum to the bullet. Only about half of the powder is actually propelled down the barrel, it doesn't mave but a few grams of mass, and it moves by far slower. It's a small percentage, don't sweat it.

5. Regarding #2, #3 and #4, these only affect recoil due to how they affect the velocity of the bullet, NOTHING ELSE, and we already know the end result here, so who really cares? Don't worry about the mechanism here, the result is all that matters in recoil, and the result speaks quite clearly so long as you forget this vain attempt to complicate the issue. It's basic, highschool physics, Newton's 3rd law to be specific, you can handle it within a second without so much as a pencil for aid, why ruin that?

@@ Line 137: / Line 137: @@
 : Yes the Marines have standerds, but even within then their are different builds, unless everyone was a clone. Second shape of the pellet does matter, due to the way in bounces withen the barrel and how it reacts with air withen the barrel. As more the barrel, a longer barrel retains the gasses longer, causeing more recoild, versis a shorter barrel, which will allow the gasses to vent faster. Also, ehat about the amount of powder and type in the shells? If the M90 shells have more powder, that will cause more recoil. [[File:80.png|20px]] '''[[User:Arabsbananas|<span style="color:Red; font-weight:bold; font-family:Tahoma Small Cap">El Ammo Bandito,</span><span style="color:Yellow; font-weight:bold; font-family:Tahoma Small Cap"> "¡Para todas sus necesidades destructivas!"</span>]]''' 20:45, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
+Time for another correction list, I guess.
+. True, but this doesn't matter, because of what I have already said.
+. This still does not affect recoil directly. It can affect the velocity of the pellets, but that's already covered.
+. This does not affect recoil. Same reason as #2.
+. This does not affect recoil significantly. The powder's contribution is more momentum to the bullet. Only about half of the powder is actually propelled down the barrel, it doesn't mave but a few grams of mass, and it moves by far slower. It's a small percentage, don't sweat it.
+. Regarding #2, #3 and #4, these only affect recoil due to how they affect the velocity of the bullet, NOTHING ELSE, and we already know the end result here, so who really cares? Don't worry about the mechanism here, the result is all that matters in recoil, and the result speaks quite clearly so long as you forget this vain attempt to complicate the issue. It's basic, highschool physics, Newton's 3rd law to be specific, you can handle it within a second without so much as a pencil for aid, why ruin that?