Editing Talk:Ruma-pattern light carrier
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{FactOrFictionTalk|03:31, 5 November 2006 (UTC)|[[User:Yamanba|Yamanba]]|Any proof? This sounds like the [[Assault Carrier]] to me.}} | |||
==Fact Or Fiction== | ==Fact Or Fiction== | ||
:This ship is a lower class then the assalit carrier. {{unsigned|Darth nexes}} | :This ship is a lower class then the assalit carrier. {{unsigned|Darth nexes}} | ||
Line 6: | Line 7: | ||
::::*The Rampant Speculation is you Speculating that this Ship Classification even exists. Common sense would dictate that this is an [[Assault Carrier]]. To say its a whole new class of ship is rampant Speculation. Once we have some dimensions we'll know for sure. -- [[User:Yamanba|Yamanba]] 06:54, 10 December 2006 (UTC) | ::::*The Rampant Speculation is you Speculating that this Ship Classification even exists. Common sense would dictate that this is an [[Assault Carrier]]. To say its a whole new class of ship is rampant Speculation. Once we have some dimensions we'll know for sure. -- [[User:Yamanba|Yamanba]] 06:54, 10 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
:*And common sense would dictate the rank system used by the UNSC is the American system, but you call that rampant speculation. Now, turn with me to page 297 of [[Halo: First Strike]]: "There were Covenant cruisers and larger carriers; there were even bigger vessels with five bulbous sections that were two kilometers stem to stern and had a dozen deadly energy projectors." Now, if these new vessels are larger than carriers, then carriers are smaller than 2000m. Now, even assuming the ''Ascendant Justice'' is an [[Assault Carrier]], the smallest Assault Carrier is 3000m. See any problems with your theory? As I have said before, I think you should try double checking instead of making everyone else prove themselves. I am sick of arguing with your double standard, where when you speculate, it is common sense, but when someone else speculates, it is rampant speculation. I am going to remove the Fact Or Fiction template again.--'''[[User:Rotaretilbo|Rot]]''' 1542 11.12.06 | :*And common sense would dictate the rank system used by the UNSC is the American system, but you call that rampant speculation. Now, turn with me to page 297 of [[Halo: First Strike]]: "There were Covenant cruisers and larger carriers; there were even bigger vessels with five bulbous sections that were two kilometers stem to stern and had a dozen deadly energy projectors." Now, if these new vessels are larger than carriers, then carriers are smaller than 2000m. Now, even assuming the ''Ascendant Justice'' is an [[Assault Carrier]], the smallest Assault Carrier is 3000m. See any problems with your theory? As I have said before, I think you should try double checking instead of making everyone else prove themselves. I am sick of arguing with your double standard, where when you speculate, it is common sense, but when someone else speculates, it is rampant speculation. I am going to remove the Fact Or Fiction template again.--'''[[User:Rotaretilbo|Rot]]''' 1542 11.12.06 | ||
::*Furthermore, ''Ghosts of Onyx'' states that a UNSC Destroyer careened into a carrier ''three times its length''. 485 meters x 3 = 1455 meters. The Assault Carrier is what...5340+ meters? Also, Yamamba, even if it is ambiguous that there's a seperate carrier classification, then this "Covenant Carrier" would serve as a placeholder classification, as per standard logic and Wookieepedia standards. Thank you, Rot. Cheers, <tt>'''[[User:RelentlessRecusant|<font color="red">Relentless</font>]]''[[User talk:RelentlessRecusant|<font color="blue">Recusant</font>]]'' | ::*Furthermore, ''Ghosts of Onyx'' states that a UNSC Destroyer careened into a carrier ''three times its length''. 485 meters x 3 = 1455 meters. The Assault Carrier is what...5340+ meters? Also, Yamamba, even if it is ambiguous that there's a seperate carrier classification, then this "Covenant Carrier" would serve as a placeholder classification, as per standard logic and Wookieepedia standards. Thank you, Rot. Cheers, <tt>'''[[User:RelentlessRecusant|<font color="red">Relentless</font>]]''[[User talk:RelentlessRecusant|<font color="blue">Recusant</font>]]''[[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]]'''</tt> 02:16, 12 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
:::*I always wondered where you got that length from...lol--[[User:Rotaretilbo|Rotaretilbo]] 03:29, 12 December 2006 (UTC) | :::*I always wondered where you got that length from...lol--[[User:Rotaretilbo|Rotaretilbo]] 03:29, 12 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
::::*No problemo, Rot. May I call you "Rot" for short? Cheers, <tt> -49 Proximal Secant ['''[[User:RelentlessRecusant|<font color="red">Relentless</font>]]''[[User talk:RelentlessRecusant|<font color="blue">Recusant</font>]]'' | ::::*No problemo, Rot. May I call you "Rot" for short? Cheers, <tt> -49 Proximal Secant ['''[[User:RelentlessRecusant|<font color="red">Relentless</font>]]''[[User talk:RelentlessRecusant|<font color="blue">Recusant</font>]]''[[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]]''']</tt> 11:19, 12 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
:::::Certainly--'''[[User:Rotaretilbo|Rot]]''' 22:37, 12 December 2006 (UTC) | :::::Certainly--'''[[User:Rotaretilbo|Rot]]''' 22:37, 12 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
Line 24: | Line 25: | ||
Just because an article calls it an carrier doesn't neccesarely mean it's true, until confirmed by bungie or ensemble that this particular ship is the covenant carrier this ship isn't the covenant carrier. | Just because an article calls it an carrier doesn't neccesarely mean it's true, until confirmed by bungie or ensemble that this particular ship is the covenant carrier this ship isn't the covenant carrier. | ||
Why yes look at the artical: "The Covenant have the use of massive orbital carriers" If it was a cruiser or a destroyer than it would be said a Destroyer. Clearly these articles are based on information released by Ensemble Studios. The books have contradicted the game before one of the most major is the Ghosts of Onyx stated only 100 Covenant ships were stationed in orbit around High Charity when in fact over a thousand were stationed in orbit. | Why yes look at the artical: "The Covenant have the use of massive orbital carriers" If it was a cruiser or a destroyer than it would be said a Destroyer. Clearly these articles are based on information released by Ensemble Studios. The books have contradicted the game before one of the most major is the Ghosts of Onyx stated only 100 Covenant ships were stationed in orbit around High Charity when in fact over a thousand were stationed in orbit. --[[User:Councilor 'Rumilee|Councilor 'Rumilee]] 17:20, 3 September 2008 (UTC) | ||