Help talk:Rollback: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 10:41, March 14, 2008

Please request rollback rights here. This page is watched to ensure the quickest response possible. Remember that, to have rollback rights, the user must have at least 1,000 total edits on the account they are requesting rollback rights for, or be an administrator on another wiki.

Request: Spartytime

I recently passed the 1,000 edit mark and would like to stop vandals and revert stupid edits.Śþλ®ţÿ ŢЎмЭ™ 14:30, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

We'll take it under consideration. Do you have any other reasons? :-) Cheers, RelentlessRecusant 'o the Halopedia Team

^TALK • _SPEAK 15:59, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

I created the UoH and was an Oracle writer.Śþλ®ţÿмЭ™ ^Talk 17:15, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Rights granted. --ED_(talk)^(gaming) 02:33, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Query: Manticore

This very page stipulates that a user must have 1000 edits to be granted rollback, but neither Anaba 'Eesoree or H*bad have this many edits. Whats going on? The reason GPT gave for giving H*bad rollback was sexeh! -- Manticore ^Talk^|^CSV 12:41, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

That is a very good question, I would like to know why as well. --ED_(talk)^(gaming) 21:33, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

H*Bad has enough edits. I have no idea about Anaba 'Eesoree. --NOTASTAFF GPT_(talk)^(eating) 21:43, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

See Special:Editcount/H*bad and Special:Editcount/Anaba 'Eesoree. Neither have enough edits, and H*bad has less than Anaba 'Eesoree. -- Manticore

^Talk^|^CSV 01:04, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Update: Both users have lost rollback rights, as neither have the required total edits. -- Manticore

^{Talk | CSV} 12:21, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Request: Guitarplayer001

I, Guitarplayer001, request rollback rights because I have already helped fight vandalism a little bit, and would like to help fight vandalism more, and I started the Former MoH (now GoH).

File:1 I am saving up for this -1.jpg Guitarplayer001^{Contact Me}^{See where I have rocked out!} 20:04, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment: You only have 88 mainspace edits. I think it would be more appropriate if you had more before being granted rollback, but thats just me. -- Manticore

^Talk^|^CSV 03:33, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Agreed, you'll need more edits. --ED_(talk)^(gaming) 04:08, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Request: CommanderTony

I'd like to request my ability to have Rollback Rights. I currently have around 2000 edits, 1200 of those are main edits.

Sincerely,
File:UNSCoH Dingo without letters.PNG Colonel Tony^Talk 8/9/2007

Comment: If you give some examples of vandalism you've reverted, this would help your request ;) -- Manticore

^Talk^|^CSV 09:10, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

03:38, 10 August 2007 RelentlessRecusant (Talk | contribs) granted rollback rights to User:CommanderTony (Congratulations, Commander.) -- Manticore

^Talk^|^CSV 09:33, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Request: Spartan781

Can I have the Rollback priveledge? I already have more than 2000 edits.--Spartan-781 ^Comm_CSV 00:08, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Comment: If you give some examples of vandalism you've reverted, this would help your request ;) -- Manticore

^Talk^|^CSV 09:13, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

01:20, 10 August 2007 Guesty-Persony-Thingy (Talk | contribs) granted rollback rights to User:Spartan781 -- Manticore

^Talk^|^CSV 09:38, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Request: HaloDude

I'm requesting Rollback rights, having recently passed the 2000 total edit mark. An obvious reason why i would like Rollback rights is to help revert vandalism and/or uneccesary edits. I'm responsible, and i'm also a councilor in the CoH. Anyway, i'll let you decide. What did HaloDude Do!?! 13:50, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Granted. --DEMON SPAWN ED 03:14, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Request: SPARTAN-077

I recently made the 1,000 edit mark and would like to revert vandalism when it arises --Captain 077, ready for duty^{(Frequencies are clear, go ahead sir)}^{( Ops completed)}File:400px-1083738227 15 9 00 KP 2000.jpg

I think the Admins would want way more Mainspace edits than 150. But I don't know, i'm just recommending it.File:UNSCoH Dingo without letters.PNG Colonel Tony^Talk 8/11/2007

This decision however, is not your choosing, Tony --Captain 077, ready for duty^{(Frequencies are clear, go ahead sir)}^{( Ops completed)}File:MA5C Firing.gif 00:09, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Agreed, you are low on mainspace edits. However, as there is not a specific number of mainspace edits required, I'm going to set it at 150, and geant them to you. --DEMON SPAWN ED 03:16, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Firstly, 150 edits is not enough--I'll ask ED to change the policy to something moar reasonable. Secondly, the plus sign next to edit is there for a reason. When you use that, it properly formats new sections, since you are apparently incapable of doing so yourself--a blank line goes between the == Blahblahblah == and the rest of the message. --NOTASTAFF GPT_(talk)^(eating) 03:16, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Gah, didn't see ED's comment. Personally, I think that 250 is a MUCHO bettaro numbar... --NOTASTAFF GPT_(talk)^(eating) 03:17, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

OK, we can change that, but its not really fair to enforce the rules ex post facto, so they'll have to apply from now on, I guess. --DEMON SPAWN ED 03:21, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

13:15, 16 August 2007 ED (Talk | contribs | block) granted rollback rights to User:SPARTAN-077 (1,000 edits) -- Manticore

^{Talk | Contributions} 07:19, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Okay, I've now got over 250 mainspace, I guess I've legally aquired them! ;D -- The State^{(Our Decrees and Law)}^{(The State Alchemists we've enlisted)}File:ROY!.jpg 17:58, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Request: Mouse among men

I just passed the 1000 edits mark, with about 38% mainspace, have a high position in most usergroups, and created the PoH. Here are a few examples of me reverting vandalism. Here's my edit count and contributions. I'm sure most active ones here have heard of me, so I'm not just "that guy who made that thing." Hope this gets through! Until next time, respect them Grunts. This is M o u s e, squeaking out! 19:34, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Granted. --DEMON SPAWN ED 03:14, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Nice way to show examples ;) Plainlinks would have been more impressive though :P -- Manticore

^{Talk | CSV | RfA} 09:34, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Request: Ajax 013

Yeah, i passed 1000 main space edits and now i wanna crush vandal and newb edits more effeciently, which roll back is going to be a great help. Most of you know i work dilligently to clean up the filth that is poor editing and this would be a great boon for that. --Ajax 013 09:23, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

This probably isn't my place to say, but rollback rights would greatly benefit Ajax and his already impressive work. I don't see anyone work to clean poor editing as much as him. What did HaloDude Do!?! 17:29, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Rollback rights granted. -- Manticore

^{Talk | CSV} 13:12, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Request: Halofan

I've passed the 1,000 mark and almost got up to 2,000. Since my userpage was vandelized earlier this year, I've wanted Rollback Rights so I can protect my userpage and all the other pages on Halopedia from vandels. ĦДĿΘFáЙ "ДňḌ áиŐТЋéṜ ĜŗŲṆṭ bίТËṣ тḤє ḌŲšт" 08:18, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Rollback rights granted. -- Manticore

^{Talk | Contributions} 09:50, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Request: Chief frank 001

i past the 1000 mark a few days ago and i request roolback for protectthing my favorite site of all time halopedia and also to help other user to kept halopedia safe from massive attack(or small) like it from june 4th 2007, when i was alone to protect halo fanon. I never vandalize any wikia and if i got rollback i wich to help you. I realy wich to have some rollback.ÇЋЇŒʢ ʕЛΆΝќAegis Company File:Marines HALO wars.jpg^{βĻά βĻά βĻά}_{ɰЊάł Ḷ ḍõИШ} 18:11, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Rollback rights granted. -- Manticore

^{Talk | Contributions} 13:59, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Request: Spartan G-23

I hit the 1,000 mark a while back and I want rollback so I (Like CF001) can protect my most often visited and favourite site of all time and help others to keep it safe which I have been doing ever since my first vandal encounter in March 6th, 2007 which was about a week after I joined. Since then I have fought many vandals on Halopedia (and halo-fanon) and I wish to have rollback to help keep Halopedia safe.--First Sergeant G-23 ^{Comm Channel} _{Mission History}File:Marine Corp 1stSgt.jpg B Company 03:28, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Rollback rights granted. -- Manticore

^{Talk | Contributions} 04:01, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Request: Sgt.johnson

I hit the 1,000 mark about a week ago. In vandal fighting, I have experienced problems reverting the edits before the final edit made by that user/IP. Usually, vandals make 2 edits to pages making it hard for me or other users to fully revert thier edits. And so, that is why I am requesting rollback rights. I have been fighting vandals for a while because I just hate it when people think they can mess up what others have been working so hard on. The Sarge File:Marine Corp SSGT.JPG^Comm _CSV 02:10, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Firstly, the history of a page can be used to revert edits by multiple editors. I could revert this page to it's first revision rather easily, without the use of rollback or sysop tools.

Secondly, I'm a little concerned with your use of ordinary undo, including this reversion in violation of policy. This page blanking after a content dispute also worries me.

After taking that into consideration, and your editcount, I think this request should be denied for now. Come back when you have some more mainspace edits, and have demonstrated you know how to appropriately use normal editing tools. -- Manticore

^{Talk | Contributions} 13:40, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

The page blanking was when I first arrived to the site... I do remember that, and i understand why I was turned down. I shall take your constructive critisism to heart.

The Sarge File:Marine Corp 1stSgt.jpg^Comm _CSV 21:08, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Request 2

Even though it has been a very few number of days since my first application, I feel that I am ready for the privilege of rollback. I have properly learned how to use editing tools since then and I have long since settled my issues that were referenced in the previous application. I have increased my edit count and I have significantly fought vandalism. Therefore, I request rollback rights for the second time.

Don't Mess With The Sarge File:Marine Corp 1stSgt.jpg^{My Comm Line} _{My Wars} 00:29, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

~~: I don't need rollback. Don't Mess With The Sarge File:Marine Corp 1stSgt.jpg^{My Comm Line} _{My Wars} 02:16, 4 November 2007 (UTC)~~

Even though it has been a very few number of days since my first application, I feel that I am ready for the privilege of rollback. I have properly learned how to use editing tools since then and I have long since settled my issues that were referenced in the previous application. I have increased my edit count and I have significantly fought vandalism. Therefore, I request rollback rights for the second time. -- A J File:ArmyJROTC.jpg 02:53, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

"I have properly learned how to use editing tools". No you haven't. Case in point: [1]. Instead of using the history to revert, you've used undo. What are you doing changing his userpage anyway? If he wants to blank it, that's his right. -- Manticore

^{Talk | Contributions} 07:04, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

He asked me to change his userpage back. And yes, for Simon's request, he always used the "undo" button. You granted it to him. And so, I see your arguement is flawed. -- A J File:ArmyJROTC.jpg 15:30, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

You should only use undo for reverting one revision that recent, otherwise use the history. I don't have the time to review every single edit either of you have made, but Simon doesn't have a history of going against policy or blanking articles like you do. Request denied. -- Manticore ^{Talk | Contributions} 15:38, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Only two incidents on my record. The first one was when I was a n00b. The second was because the kid was slightly suicidal.
I have learned how to properly edit as of November 16th, 2007

-- But, obviously, my arguements will, and have had, no effect. --A J File:ArmyJROTC.jpg 15:46, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Request 3

I have learned how to properly use the edit tools - My Sandbox (check the history), I have greatly increased my edit count, and all issues pertaining to page blanking have been resolved. In addition, I am an admin at the Ace Combat wiki and as for edit quality, I am a First Sergeant (Gunnery Sergeant Grade 4) in the UoH. Please consider my request. Thank you. -- A J File:ArmyJROTC.jpg 02:31, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

I have reverted vandalism on these occasions:

[2]
[3]
[4] - It was huge, I was one of the first to notice and revert, from there, I was edit conflicted.
[5] - And yes, this was before I learned.
[6]
[7]
[8]

Along with many, many others. -- A J File:ArmyJROTC.jpg 16:53, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Usergroup ranks are irrelevant, and it has been less than a week since you last applied. You seem to end each unsuccessful application with "I don't need rollback", something you later strike out before applying again. Perhaps now that you have learnt how to revert using the history you can put that into practice a bit before applying again. -- Manticore

^{Talk | Contributions} 05:56, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

I don't think there's anything extraordinary about the majority of our Rollback-ers, and I don't think there's anything particularly stellar about AJ. His administratorship at ACW was because ACW was inactive and he petioned to staff for administratorship, and UNSCOH rank is not particularly weighty in determination of this. While at our current poor standard for Rollback-ers, AJ is somewhat qualified, I think that the standard needs to be raised; there's nothing wrong on AJ's behalf, just the par at which we grade users. Cheers, RelentlessRecusant 'o the Halopedia Team

^TALK • _MESSAGE 07:13, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Why is AJ getting punished because you don't like the system? And how on earth can you say that AJ is "not particularly stellar"? Just look at his contributions in comparison to the other people who have gotten rollback. And Manticore, stop denying him rollback because you don't like him and/or he made a mistake when he was new. How is it people with around 1,000 edits are getting Rollback, but AJ, who has more then twice that amount isn't? Tesfan 23:56, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

By what I've seen, them not liking him is most likely why he isn't being granted Rollback. And Tes was right, he's made more than enough edits to be granted Rollback. What else does he need to do? -- C R File:ArmyROTC.gif 00:05, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Guys, I aprreciate your concern, but they've already said that unless I work on it more, they won't grant it to me.-- A J File:ArmyJROTC.jpg 00:13, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Just out of curiosity, when you said, "They've already said I have to work on it more." Who's they've? -- C R File:ArmyROTC.gif 01:46, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Manticore... -- A J File:ArmyJROTC.jpg 01:49, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

That, is only one person...--C R File:ArmyROTC.gif 01:56, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Administrators -- A J File:ArmyJROTC.jpg 02:01, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Really. So far, I've only seen 2 Admins say anything about it. -- C R File:ArmyROTC.gif 02:07, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

I've asked GPT and RR about it, you can see RR's opinon, and GPT still hasn't seen it. -- A J File:ArmyJROTC.jpg 02:09, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

I know their opinions...It's just that what some of their opinions are that kinda confuse me. You've learned how to use undo properly. You've surpaassed the edit count. Quite frankly, I'm starting to get the impression that they have something against you. But it's not my say in weither you get Rollback or not. I'm just sensing some hostility around this. But I could be way off on that. -- C R File:ArmyROTC.gif 02:23, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

I've thought that before, but, it's completely false. -- A J File:ArmyJROTC.jpg 02:24, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Alright, here's my issue

I honestly don't understand Manticore's reasoning. Yes, AJ has made mistakes, but from what has been stated and knowing the histories of various members that have been granted rollback and looking at the previous reasons used to justify not giving a user rollback, I don't understand the objection. No one has ever before been rejected because of policy violations (certainly not policy violations in their first two weeks as a Halopedian) - all rejections to date have been based SOLELY upon a lack of mainspace edits. I have my suspicions as to the motivations behind this, but that's another story.
I can understand RR's point - not that I agree with it, but I can understand it. However, the problem is that RR is not the one handing out the rollbacks and while he's banging on about lack of quality in those that have rollback rights, people who wouldn't meet RR's criteria for rollback continue to be granted rollback rights with no visible dispute by Manticore. Considering that I got him involved in this issue because I believed there was an issue of moderator bias that was playing a roll in this decision process, having him bang on about qualifications that is not expected of the average rollback candidate while there potentially is an issue of ongoing injustice is failing to get the job done.
I simply don't believe that by Manticore's normal standards, AJ would be rejected for Rollback rights. I honestly think that if a person with a name he's never had an issue with had the same history as AJ, this entire incident would turn into a much different matter
I don't, BTW, disagree that someone who re-applied only a week after being rejected should be accepted under the claim that they've turned things around and have demonstrated a renewed competence. I lay no challenge to the third rejection. However, the first two strike me as extraordinarily odd.

--forgottenlord 02:27, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Request 4

After a month of practicing, I believe that I am ready for the privileges of rollback. Many of my edits while I took a break from Halopedia to work on Ace Wiki were reverts to vandalism, and as seen, I have used the history to revert instead of undo. Along with that, I have gained valuable experience being an administrator and bureaucrat at Ace Wiki in vandalism fighting and rollback controls. Along with that, I have increased my main space edit count to 1,000.

Listed below are a few of the cases where I have reverted vandalism.

http://halo.wikia.com/index.php?title=Halo_3_Medals&diff=301959&oldid=301955

http://halo.wikia.com/index.php?title=Halo_3&diff=297906&oldid=297905

http://halo.wikia.com/index.php?title=Halo_3&diff=prev&oldid=297905

http://halo.wikia.com/index.php?title=Final_Grunt&diff=297895&oldid=297893

http://halo.wikia.com/index.php?title=Cortana_Letters&diff=prev&oldid=294614

http://halo.wikia.com/index.php?title=Sangheili&diff=prev&oldid=294592

http://halo.wikia.com/index.php?title=Halo_3_Skulls&diff=prev&oldid=284764

http://halo.wikia.com/index.php?title=Halo_3_Skulls&diff=prev&oldid=284580

http://halo.wikia.com/index.php?title=Halo_3_Skulls&diff=prev&oldid=284655

http://halo.wikia.com/index.php?title=Halo_3_Skulls&diff=prev&oldid=284759

There are many, many more, but they are very far back in my history.

Please consider this, along with some of the reasons stated in my first few applications. Thank you. -- A J File:ArmyJROTC.jpg 00:25, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Granted. -- Manticore (talk) 18:51, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Request: Simon rjh

I havent been at Halopedia that long (I joined in late August) but I feel I deserve rollback rights because I have fought vandalism in the past and have had to use the puny (undo) button. I made lots of decent contributions to Halopedia, and have been very active in the UoH - I am currently a General, the highest rank. This is my 1001st edit (I'm that keen ;D ) - but almost half of my edits are mainspace. I browse Halopedia frequently and go on IRC whenever I can, so users can contact me. General s i m o n r jh 18:11, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Granted. -- Manticore

^{Talk | Contributions} 02:00, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Request: Emosworld

I just gained the 1,000 edit mark a few days ago. I've had experience with rollback on other wikis e.g RuneScape Wiki. If you don't believe I have over 1000 edits, check here or here. I hate vandals. Examples of vandalism I have reverted:

and plenty more, I can't be bothered searching them up anymore. Thanks, Emos 09:26, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Granted. -- Manticore

^{Talk | Contributions} 11:39, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Request: Master Chief Petty Officer

Well, I've just passed a 1000 edits, and although I frequently edit disucssion pages, and some edits on the main pages, I hope that the admins will grant me this authority because I've recently seen some newb edits, and can only suggest to some users who can do rollbacks. I hope that I can be granted this authority so that I can do them myself. MasterChiefPettyOfficer_{Spartan Contribution} 11:32, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

I concur, MCPO had to ask me to rollback these edits to the Monitor page. General si mo n r jh 13:58, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Rollback isn't a position of authority. It doesn't give you any more rights than a normal user. It is merely an additional technical tool to help revert vandalism. The fact that you think you need rollback to revert vandalism is quite concerning. Can you show any examples where you have actually reverted vandalism? Looking at your mainspace contributions, I can't see any edit summaries with "undo" or "revert", or anything similar that would indicate you are reverting vandalism. -- Manticore

^{Talk | Contributions} 19:40, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Ah, maybe the word "authority" is the wrong term. I admit that I edit talk pages frequently, but I resolve to do a better work, but the problem is, when I spotted vandalism, will I be putting all my time into entering a page with more than 32 kilobytes? I can only suggest to people who can do rollbacks. It is my wish that to do rollbacks when I spotted vandalism, maybe as well, to protect the pages which is most likely to be edit by newbs, even though in some cases, I haven't spotted vandalism as often as others, I would like to revert them when I spotted one.

Yours sincerely, MCPO MasterChiefPettyOfficer_{Spartan Contribution} 11:37, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Request: Specops306

I have recently reached the 1,370 edit mark, editing articles and discussion pages, and have put up at least a dozen articles for deletion, either for vandalism or because they were unneccessary. I've also reverted as much vandalism as possible in existing articles, such as sad people putting their gamer tags into random articles to get xbox live friends, and I deleted a particular piece of fanon on the Warthog article about a "narwhal." Rollback rights would make this task easier. As always, I await your judgement, and shall accept your decision. Honour Light Your Way - File:HalfJaw03.jpg Kora ‘Morhek The Battle-Net My Conquests. 23:05, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Granted. Now go read Halopedia:Signature Policy. -- Manticore (talk) 23:42, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Request: EwCDnaudee419

Dear Administrators,

I have recently passed the 1,000 edit mark and am requesting rollback rights. I have helped stop vandalism in many cases by reporting users (to CommanderTony, ED, etc.) and adding fan fiction/Spam pages to the Candidates for Deletion Page. Rollback rights will help me further when it comes to stoping vandals. Thank You for your time, EwCDnaudee 23:22, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Granted. -- Manticore (talk) 09:35, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Undo

Isn't this the same as the "undo" feature when looking at the differences? Lovemuffin 01:33, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

No it isnt, read the explanation for Rollback Rights on its page. Undo button is given to stop vandals, Rollback is granted by earning it and goes a step further when combating Vandalism. EwCDnaudee 10:28, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Every registered user has access to undo. -- Manticore (talk) 09:24, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Request: Bllasae

Hey, I would like rollback rights to revert vandalism and fight spam. I am a Sysop of the wiki, Tropico Wiki, a Wiki dedicated to the computer game, Tropico. Also, I have successfully created, tested, and run a Wikipedia bot on the Halopedia site,and helped find many broken and dead-end links. Thanks!Bllasae 06:53, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Denied. You lack knowledge of our policies, you don't understand a basic concept like signing talk page edits, and I'd hardly call the hundreds of pages you screwed up "successful" bot edits. -- Manticore (talk) 16:29, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Request: Lovemuffin

I have recently passed the 1,000 edit mark and am requesting Rollback Rights. I have been a constant monitor for spam and other lewd behavior, quickly making wrongs into rights. I remember one time, the entire Halo 3 page was deleted and replaced with "f*** halo", which I did not give a second's hesitation to undo. If you look at my blogs, most of them are concerning the improvement of the Halopedia site. All my quiz questions and polls are clean, correct, and not immature or crude. I am a member of the Half-Life Wikia as well as the Command and Conquer Wikia. I also am a member of Wikipedia and that means I hold the highest standards when it comes to proper editing. As most of you know, I thought of the idea to create the Defenders of Halopedia, working together to get it approved. Although some of you may disapprove of the Usergroup, it is obvious that it's intentions are respectful and for the support of Halopedia. If the the usergroup is created, Rollback Rights will help me execute my job as a Defender. If it is not accepted, Having Rollback Rights will help me still carry out DoH's righteous intentions, which were to relinquish Halopedia from impurity. I would be very grateful to have Rollback Rights and I hope you agree with my request. Lovemuffin_{Wiki Userpage}_{Talk Page}_{Contributions}File:Dancing master chief.gif 07:36, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Granted. --E D File:ArmyROTC.gif 14:41, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:36, March 13, 2008 (edit) halowikia>Lovemuffin No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 10:41, March 14, 2008 (edit) (undo) ED (talk \| contribs) m (→‎Request: Lovemuffin) Newer edit →
Line 274:		Line 274:

	I have recently passed the 1,000 edit mark and am requesting Rollback Rights. I have been a constant monitor for spam and other lewd behavior, quickly making wrongs into rights. I remember one time, the entire Halo 3 page was deleted and replaced with "f*** halo", which I did not give a second's hesitation to undo. If you look at my blogs, most of them are concerning the improvement of the Halopedia site. All my quiz questions and polls are clean, correct, and not immature or crude. I am a member of the Half-Life Wikia as well as the Command and Conquer Wikia. I also am a member of Wikipedia and that means I hold the highest standards when it comes to proper editing. As most of you know, I thought of the idea to create the Defenders of Halopedia, working together to get it approved. Although some of you may disapprove of the Usergroup, it is obvious that it's intentions are respectful and for the support of Halopedia. If the the usergroup is created, Rollback Rights will help me execute my job as a Defender. If it is not accepted, Having Rollback Rights will help me still carry out DoH's righteous intentions, which were to relinquish Halopedia from impurity. I would be very grateful to have Rollback Rights and I hope you agree with my request. [[User:Lovemuffin\|'''<font color="RoyalBlue">Lovemuffin</font>''']]<sub>[[UserWiki:Lovemuffin\|<font color="DarkSlateGray">Wiki Userpage</font>]]</sub><sub>[[User talk:Lovemuffin\|<font color="Gray">Talk Page</font>]]</sub><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Lovemuffin\|<font color="black">Contributions</font>]]</sub>[[Image:Dancing_master_chief.gif\|30px]] 07:36, 13 March 2008 (UTC)		I have recently passed the 1,000 edit mark and am requesting Rollback Rights. I have been a constant monitor for spam and other lewd behavior, quickly making wrongs into rights. I remember one time, the entire Halo 3 page was deleted and replaced with "f*** halo", which I did not give a second's hesitation to undo. If you look at my blogs, most of them are concerning the improvement of the Halopedia site. All my quiz questions and polls are clean, correct, and not immature or crude. I am a member of the Half-Life Wikia as well as the Command and Conquer Wikia. I also am a member of Wikipedia and that means I hold the highest standards when it comes to proper editing. As most of you know, I thought of the idea to create the Defenders of Halopedia, working together to get it approved. Although some of you may disapprove of the Usergroup, it is obvious that it's intentions are respectful and for the support of Halopedia. If the the usergroup is created, Rollback Rights will help me execute my job as a Defender. If it is not accepted, Having Rollback Rights will help me still carry out DoH's righteous intentions, which were to relinquish Halopedia from impurity. I would be very grateful to have Rollback Rights and I hope you agree with my request. [[User:Lovemuffin\|'''<font color="RoyalBlue">Lovemuffin</font>''']]<sub>[[UserWiki:Lovemuffin\|<font color="DarkSlateGray">Wiki Userpage</font>]]</sub><sub>[[User talk:Lovemuffin\|<font color="Gray">Talk Page</font>]]</sub><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Lovemuffin\|<font color="black">Contributions</font>]]</sub>[[Image:Dancing_master_chief.gif\|30px]] 07:36, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
			:Granted. --<b>[[User:ED\|<font color="black">E</font>]][[User talk:ED\|<font color="black">D</font>]][[Image:ArmyROTC.gif\|15px]]</b> 14:41, 14 March 2008 (UTC)