You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with
other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 28: |
Line 28: |
|
| |
|
| :All things considered, yes. 343 Guilty Spark was well within the protocol outline for defense of his Installation. [[User talk:Ocean Soul|Ocean Soul]] 15:02, 11 September 2011 (EDT) | | :All things considered, yes. 343 Guilty Spark was well within the protocol outline for defense of his Installation. [[User talk:Ocean Soul|Ocean Soul]] 15:02, 11 September 2011 (EDT) |
|
| |
| ::I agree -343GS did what he thought was right. I suppose his drastic countermeasures would be thought of as rampancy to the UNSC, whose AIs are designed not to harm humans. However, we must remember that he is an armed, military AI who follows orders to the letter. If it says "kill potential threats," he damn well does his duty.-- '''[[User:Forerunner|<font color="blue">Fore</font>]]''[[User talk:Forerunner|<font color="green">run</font>]]''[[Special:Contributions/Forerunner|<font color="red">ner</font>]]''''' 16:16, 11 September 2011 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Era dispute== | | ==Era dispute== |