Talk:Preceptor: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
No edit summary |
NightHammer (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Isn't the article contradicting itself a bit there? First saying that Preceptors were specialized Forerunners and then mentioning that they were "constructs". To be fair, Warfleet does this too, though I think the mention in the "Peacemakers" section doesn't ''necessarily'' have to mean the Preceptors were also constructs, though that seems to be the implication. Maybe there's both a specialized class of Forerunners and a type of policing machine with the same name? --[[User:Jugus|Jugus]] ([[User talk:Jugus|talk]]) 10:51, 13 September 2017 (EDT) | Isn't the article contradicting itself a bit there? First saying that Preceptors were specialized Forerunners and then mentioning that they were "constructs". To be fair, Warfleet does this too, though I think the mention in the "Peacemakers" section doesn't ''necessarily'' have to mean the Preceptors were also constructs, though that seems to be the implication. Maybe there's both a specialized class of Forerunners and a type of policing machine with the same name? --[[User:Jugus|Jugus]] ([[User talk:Jugus|talk]]) 10:51, 13 September 2017 (EDT) | ||
:Nothing was said in Warfleet reviews or in email correspondence at the time of these reviews. My read of the usage would be similar to how Guilty Spark was formerly a person and then a construct. If I can get an answer from someone at 343i I'll make a further post here. -[[User:ScaleMaster117|ScaleMaster117]] ([[User talk:ScaleMaster117|talk]]) 19:10, 11 September 2018 (EDT) | |||
::I agree the article seems contradictory, but that's how ''Warfleet'' describes the Preceptors. I suppose we can leave it for now until we get any further information. --[[User:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">'''NightHammer'''</span>]]''<sup>[[User talk:NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(talk)</span>]]</sup><sup>[[Special:Contributions/NightHammer|<span style="color: #2B1AAA;">(contribs)</span>]]</sup>'' 00:21, 12 September 2018 (EDT) |
Revision as of 00:21, September 12, 2018
Biological or construct
Isn't the article contradicting itself a bit there? First saying that Preceptors were specialized Forerunners and then mentioning that they were "constructs". To be fair, Warfleet does this too, though I think the mention in the "Peacemakers" section doesn't necessarily have to mean the Preceptors were also constructs, though that seems to be the implication. Maybe there's both a specialized class of Forerunners and a type of policing machine with the same name? --Jugus (talk) 10:51, 13 September 2017 (EDT)
- Nothing was said in Warfleet reviews or in email correspondence at the time of these reviews. My read of the usage would be similar to how Guilty Spark was formerly a person and then a construct. If I can get an answer from someone at 343i I'll make a further post here. -ScaleMaster117 (talk) 19:10, 11 September 2018 (EDT)
- I agree the article seems contradictory, but that's how Warfleet describes the Preceptors. I suppose we can leave it for now until we get any further information. --NightHammer(talk)(contribs) 00:21, 12 September 2018 (EDT)